Naval Intelligence And US Foreign Policies
Elaine Meinel Supkis
As China rebuilds its navy, as Russia renews all its mighty arms, as the dollar dies and Japan loses influence due to the dud yen, the balance of power is shifting! And this shows up in the military news. The US is still losing the war in Iraq, everyone is counting the days of the final helicopters taking off from the roof of the Green Zone embassy. Like Britain after WWI, the US decided after the Vietnam defeat, we would conquer even more of the world. This is bankrupting us.
Several submarines, including at least one U.S. Navy nuclear-propelled attack submarine, will also participate. An Australian official stated, "This will be the biggest multilateral maritime exercise the Indian Navy will be involved in so far. The joint interaction will have all the three dimensions -- air elements, surface warships and submarines."The five-day Malabar-07 exercise will see land-based Jaguar strike aircraft of the Indian Air Force participating.
A June 2007 exercise involving Indian, Japanese, and U.S. warships off the Japanese coast had evoked a strong reaction from the Chinese government. Chinese officials issued a statement to the three nations demanding to know the reason they were undertaking naval exercises so close to Chinese territory. Similar questions are expected from China concerning Malabar-07. India and China, the later a supporter of Pakistan, have long been political and, at times, military enemies.
Some Indian political parties have also expressed opposition to the September exercise, claiming that such action will pull India into alliances.
Such exercises tend to build close relationship among the participating navies. And, often regional nations not participating in them will seek to do so in the future.
For some reason, we imagine that if we just get everyone to join our little navy, we would, like Britain, still rule the Seven Seas and will remain the world's most powerful military. The foolishness of forming a military/invasion force consisting of two of China's strongest neighbors is like lighting a firecracker under a dragon who holds all our money and then daring it to kill us.
The idea of triangulation is for a power to NOT form dangerous alliances that then motivates rivals to do the same! Namely, we have to consider who is harming us and how they are harming us. And strengthening one group so it counterbalances other groups. Japan is our top international trade rival. Next is Germany who is being shouldered aside by China, who is #4 this month but probably will be #3 before fall. Both Japan and India are frightened by this rise in Chinese power. They hope they can triangulate against China. If I were them, I would do this.
But NOT if I were the US. In our case, what do we gain by all this? Japan and India are our rivals. Our economy is in increasing trouble. Do we have trade surpluses with either Japan or India? No? Well...here we are, trying to make them stronger at our own expense! Britain became very powerful by marrying her navy to the needs of the traders in London. The British Navy didn't go sailing about, trying to strengthen the American Navy, for example. Or the German Navy! Much less, the Spanish Main! Indeed, they got very bent out of shape whenever anyone started to build up their navies.
One of the biggest errors made by England was allowing the Japanese to build up a navy able to rival the great Russian Navy. In a sharp confrontation at sea which ended Russian expansion in Asia, Japan displayed her rising power. The British wanted dearly to clip that short but were already disasterously overextended trying to hold down China. The emperor was falling in power and war lords were strengthening and the chaos in China was growing worse and worse.
All this, before WWI! The fact is, after WWI, both the US and Japan became the defacto naval powers on earth and the US and Britain both decided to make Japan's navy even stronger in a bid to hem in the new Soviet Union. This is also why the US decided, despite Churchill's warnings, to allow the Germans to strengthen the Reich and to rebuild their navy.
China has repeatedly asked us this last three years to do more military things together to show our good intentions. This is fading as the US, urged on by Japan, has become more, not less, belligerent. I have many old books and here is an example from a book published by the Navy back in 1898 called 'How Uncle Sam Fights' printed by RH. Woodward. It is the official book for civilian education put out by the War Department.
This book is full of interesting stuff because the US had, until the Civil War, very little as far as naval forces were concerned compared to most other sailing nations. We ceded the Seven Seas to Europe. Because we were weak, we had all sorts of interesting rules. Here is one of them:
It is awfully funny that the War Department and the State Department were both trumped by a NY banking consortium! What this Flint organization did was, sell the Chilean ship to Bolivia who didn't have any naval treaties signed so they could break the law. The official handbook also makes clear that 'privateering'--piracy- 'is lawful'. Heh. During the Civil War, Britain allowed privateers of the South to refit or refuel at British ports. Namely, in the Bermudas. The US sued in British Courts and in 1871, won a judgment in our favor so the British Crown decided it was time to make a treaty concerning our use of the oceans.
First, neither the US nor Britain would allow a foreign warship rigged so they can harry domestic frieght, use their ports IF they were 'neutral' in a fight between the countries with the warships and the countries using international shipping lanes. Second, they were not allowed to let such ships get fuel or food and water, too. If the ship needed medical help or fuel to return home, then it was OK. Of course, this was much abused.
My point here, before we get lost in Victorian naval law is, the rule of the Seven Seas is a very complex affair. The UN is supposed to have some say about things but basically, it is a sea-dog eat sea-dog affair and except for submarines, the US rules the waves and so we make the rules. Like Britain back then, we have to accept reality and try to make some sort of treaties that make life easier for ourselves to maintain power.
But I mentioned submarines! Britain didn't create this, they were invented by non-naval powers like the South during the Civil War! For submarines are the great levelers in naval power equations. The US is very agitated about not only Russia's submarine rebirth, China is now building nuclear subs with MIRV missiles. All the naval parades we are making this year are aimed at 'shocking and awing' two rising powers who can shock us to death by simply dumping $2 trillion into the world's monetary markets! Both rocket and submarine power, the yin/yang extremes of warfare, are the two forces that will annihilate us in WWIII. Namely, all our puny aircraft carriers and all the warships accompanying them are two-bit players in the Götterdämmerung of total nuclear warfare. This is why the parades and wargames of our navy are so worthless. The US tore up the very treaties with Russia and China that would protect us the most! All the nuclear treaties bought with such difficulty were ripped up unilaterally by Bush. On top of trying to place missles on Russia's borders, we also used NATO as a global imperial invasion course.
The UN just dropped the issue of Kosovo because Russia and China won't let the UN dismember yet another country. The UN seems bent on making all small countries, smaller even as the major powers are consolidating their own political bases. In this context, the US/Japan/India naval games are a provocation.
Saudi Arabia has dropped its support for a land-for-peace deal between Israel and the Arab world over fears of al-Qaeda attacks, an Israeli official said Saturday.
"We estimate the Saudis got cold feet over suspicions of Iran and fears ofterror attacks sponsored by Iran and al-Qaeda," the official said.
"According to our information, the royal palace was frightened, withdrew from the peace initiative and threw the political ball in the court of Jordanian King Abdullah," the official stated.
The official added that Egypt's Intelligence chief Omar Suleiman raised the issue of Saudi Arabia with US President George W. Bush during a visit to Washington last week.
When Bush announced plans to hold the conference in his speech about the Middle East last week, Saudi Arabia failed to announce whether it would attend the regional meeting. Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and President Mahmoud Abbas said they would be sending delegates to the conference.
Relations with the despots running Saudi Arabia are going sour fast, aren't they? Pakistan is getting pretty angry about us pushing them into internal confrontations they are bound to lose. China has no desire to see Islamic rebellions. Yet we act as if we alone want no rebellions. This naval show of force has weakened US influence in Pakistan and strengthened Chinese influence. We keep forgetting that all countries are jockeying for power and the shifting alliances and the manipulation of American power is all part of this process. Our job is not to blunder into all international relationship shifts. Nor can we control all relations with everyone all at once!
The problem about our power is, we use it too much in the wrong way. Our navy isn't neutral at all, being the force everyone appeals to for balance. We are instead, acting as if we are in hostilities with everyone hither or yon. For example, we occassionally parade our navy up and down the Persian Gulf cul-de-sac in the dim hopes of awing and intimidating various players on the world stage who seem far from impressed. Indeed, they study our navy as it exposes its flanks this way and with the advances in military technology, namely, DU missiles, they will sink our navy if the time is ripe. So far, all of the Pentagon's gambles about our power versus our ability to win fights, have been duds. They have no idea about strategic goals and how one must aim for only goals one can grasp.
The 1898 book I cited above assumed we would win gloriously against Spain and 'free' the people in the Spanish Empire. And extend our own empire, of course. But the valiant resistance this triggered in the Philippines took us by surprize and it was exactly like what we are going through in Iraq.
U.S. Rep. Edward Markey criticized India's friendliness with Iran and demands on Washington in its talks for a U.S.-India nuclear pact.The Massachusetts Democrat said Thursday in a statement India is trying to pressure the United States into bending on its anti-proliferation laws.
"India must understand that the legal boundaries established by the Congress for nuclear cooperation cannot be overstepped during negotiations between the two Executives," Markey wrote.
The two countries' leaders have been negotiating the deal since 2005. It would provide India access to U.S. nuclear technology and material, something banned by U.S. law since India has nuclear weapons and hasn't signed key international treaties. The deal would make an exception.
India oversteps our nuclear rules with total impunity. This is because we want India to counterbalance Russia and China. So India triangulates to its heart's content. And Congress can't change this. The president controls this business, 100%. Of course, India will triangulate with Iran. This way, they squeeze Pakistan! Who happens to also be a nuclear power. Iran, of course, is trying to form alliances with anyone who can trump American power. And there are many lurking in the shadows. We assume, everyone is up front but this is never true. After all, we are not upfront, either!
In a nutshell, China is what we were 100 years ago: the neutral power, the balance between competing empires. They offer nations some leverage. And this is where power lies: not with the party rushing about, trying to get everyone to gang up on some third party but to be the ones being courted by a pair of belligerents.
When Condoleezza Rice took over as secretary of state, the (wishful) thinking was that the Bush administration would finally get into the business of diplomacy. Ms. Rice can be as bullying and ad hominem as her boss, but she’s also an achiever and trying her hand at persuasion was probably the only hope for salvaging the administration’s failed foreign policies and her reputation.
When Bush's lover came trotting out, the spams of adoration directed to this nitwit irritated me. She has shocking little experience in the real world and she was the pet of the neo cons because she was a 'black' woman who could slip under the radar and not be attacked even if she spewed pure garbage. Powell did this too until he could no longer stomach being Bush's footman standing outside the White House with his lamp held high on the front lawn.
The NYT:
Beyond that, the administration can’t answer the most basic questions, like when and where the meeting will take place, what friendly Arab states will be coming and what the agenda is. The Palestinians want to talk about all the big things, like borders, Jerusalem and when they get the independent state Mr. Bush committed himself to five years ago. The Israelis say they can’t discuss these issues as long as Palestinian attacks on Israel continue.All of which leads back to that perplexing refusal to do the diplomatic preparation. Officials say that Ms. Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates will start filling in the blanks when they visit the region at the end of this month. But it took former Secretary of State James Baker (no slouch as a negotiator) eight grueling shuttle trips to set the stage for the 1991 Madrid peace conference.
We can parade aircraft carriers in front of the Palestinian ghetto all we like and it won't change the dynamics of this disaster. Rice's job isn't to resolve anything, it is to keep the Israeli racist steam roller running over Palestinians until the magically disappear once and forever in some funny Holocaust. Everyone hopes this will happen. Then the world will be at peace, minus around 8 billion humans. The Jews want peace talks to drag as slow as possible and since they control the US media for the most part and have an increasing grip on the US Congress and White House, they will get their way. Condi's work as their tool has its limits. Every time she tries to move anything forewards, they shove her back into her subordinate position as the house maid.
The Arab League (AL) has condemned U.S. raid on the headquarters of the Association of the Muslim Scholars (AMS) in western Baghdad, expressing hope that the Iraqi government would be able to contain the situation.
The rising irritation with the US shoving governments in Muslim lands into attacking religious foundations and leaders is causing a growing firestorm down below in the engine rooms of the Muslim nation's ships of state.
Now, the media (for example, the NYT is owned by a Jewish family) is suddenly kicking her as she prostrates herself to them.
About 2 1/2 years ago, when she was new in office, I accompanied her on her first trip around the world, with stops in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, South Korea, Japan and China. Crowds gathered to see her limousine drive past; people whistled, waved and cheered. Interviewers routinely asked her whether she was planning to run for president. One TV reporter in India told her she was "arguably the most powerful woman in the world." She chuckled but did not exactly agree -- or disagree.
How things change.
She was never powerful. She was a tool. And so long as she played the pretty puppet with the high heeled boots, she was feted and toasted. Now, she is being burned at the stake. She was inept from day one, I marveled about this constantly here. No matter how stupid she was, they all praised her. She certainly did a yeoman's labor keeping the Zionists happy! But now there is great pressure on her via the King of Saudi Arabia, for example, to do something for the Palestinians besides starving them to death. So she has meekly decided to talk to Israel and make a few tiny demands.
Slam! Not only is she suddenly ugly, she is pure box-office poison.
A few months ago, she decided to write an opinion piece about Lebanon. She enlisted John Chambers, chief executive officer of Cisco Systems as a co-author, and they wrote about public/private partnerships and how they might be of use in rebuilding Lebanon after last summer's war. No one would publish it.Think about that. Every one of the major newspapers approached refused to publish an essay by the secretary of state. Price Floyd, who was the State Department's director of media affairs until recently, recalls that it was sent to the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times and perhaps other papers before the department finally tried a foreign publication, the Financial Times of London, which also turned it down.
Geeze, I can easily think about this! A certain President Jimmy Carter was abused in the same way by the exact same people for the same reason! I know her pain well: these same outlets have black listed myself and a host of other people who used to get published in the past! The fact that the media controlled greatly by Zionist supporters, are now even refusing to publish Condi Rice is both racism at work as well as destroying the power of the government to run foreign affairs. It isn't as if Condi were in some think tank! The excuse that she wasn't published because she praised Bush is a lie.
Relations with Russia, her area of speciality, have steadily worsened; a week ago, Russia dropped out of a key arms control treaty. Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela, has evolved from an irritant to a menace as he moves to nationalize Venezuela's oil industry. Despite many visits to Israel and the Palestinian territories, she has had no appreciable impact on events there.
I saw in the Washington Post the other day, a diatribe praising Bush to the skies, full of lies, even! So that wasn't why our Secretary of State is being universally snubbed. She should resign in protest. The President should...HAHAHA. Right. Should end this miserable administration. He should be impeached. But right now, he is helpless.
HE ISN'T STUPID. He knows that 'they' waited until Nixon stopped the Vietnam War and with his buddy, a certain 'Herr Kissinger', went off to China to make more peace, the instant this was done, he was thrown out of office! Bush won't make that mistake which is why he will not end the war in Iraq.
Calling for the impeachment of U.S. President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, Cindy Sheehan and 45 fellow Iraq war protesters were arrested on Monday after they refused to leave a U.S. lawmaker's office and adjoining hallway, authorities said.Before police escorted her away, Sheehan, who emerged as a leading peace activist after her son Casey was killed in Iraq in 2004, announced what she had earlier suggested -- that she would be a candidate for Congress next year.
When Cindy announced she was leaving the Peace movement, everyone was all upset. But I knew she would come back to it because the daily stream of news was just too ugly for this woman of great heart to ignore. She is brave and I applaud her continuing efforts at trying to stop this massive machine, this wave of death and destruction. She is a hero on the level of Martin Luther King and Gandhi. May her life be preserved! The US political structure has been paralyzed concerning this lunatic war. No one can do anything excpet watch with fascination as more people die and our country gets weaker and weaker and our enemies grow legion.
The SYDNEY: Oil prices fell on Monday, on expectations of higher US refinery production and after remarks by OPEC that it is ready to pump more oil if needed. London Brent crude currently seen as more representative of the world market, slid 36 cents to $77.28 a barrel by 0444 GMT, after easing 3 cents on Friday. US crude for September traded 22 cents lower at $75.57. The...
The Saudis know that our financial ship will sink soon. They have to keep our navy afloat because they have some relentless enemies who are Muslim who are seeking their destruction. And they love money and luxury which is why their Muslim brethern want to kill them. And this is life: full of paradoxes. Everyone wants to have their cakes and eat them, too. We have to always make hard choices and the status quo as it is set today, is not a possible choice for the future. We have to chart a course that doesn't take us to the blood-red sea called 'Global Total Warfare.' Where there are no rules or treaties, just brute force.






Recent Comments