Media News

Tony Blair Has Secret Meetings With Media Mogul Murdoch

Elaine Meinel Supkis

If anyone is wondering why Blair blythely goes against the wishes of his own people and is supporting wars wanted by neo con Zionists, all they have to do is look at who his sponsors are. He is openly thinking about joining the Carlyle Group which makes much of their money off of launching wars and now we learn he might work for Murdoch who runs a huge Zionist propaganda machine that spans the entire planet.

Raw Story breaks this news.

By Andrew Grice, Political Editor
Published: 29 July 2006
The media magnate Rupert Murdoch is expected to offer Tony Blair a senior role in his News Corporation empire when he stands down as Prime Minister.

Allies of Mr Blair insist he has made no decisions about his plans when he leaves Downing Street -- almost certainly next year. But some friends say a seat on the board of News Corp could tempt the outgoing Prime Minister, as it would dovetail neatly with the lucrative United States lecture circuit. Mr Blair's popularity at home may be waning, but he remains big box office in America. His close relationship with Mr Murdoch will be highlighted tomorrow when he addresses the annual gathering of News Corp's executives and senior journalists from around the world.

Most of what Raw Story runs are other paper's headlines which is useful, I go there every day to see what headlines they have harvested, but periodically, they themeselves, break news stories and this is one that jumped out at me.

The media and our 'representatives' have intertwined themselves with each other nearly seamlessly. It used to be, there was an invisible wall separating them somewhat. Welles' movie, 'Citizen Kane' was about how a newspaper mogul tried to turn himself into a politician and failed, was an interesting take on the media/political matrix. Italy was victimized by this very process, a media mogul taking over a country after running a campaign on his own behalf and of course, keeping all opponents out of the news except for scandals.

Most of the time, media moguls hide in the dark. The fact that the one in Italy is now standing trial for corruption gives them all the willies. So they do what happens here or in Mexico or England, etc: the media pre-picks their own candidates, since there are so few media owners, they can conspire to choose whoever they want to boost and then they proceed to tear apart any opponents. Even the most popular politicans can, if they dare go against the wishes of the owners of the media, be destroyed if the media owners wish to destroy them.

When Clinton was trying to get Israel to negotiate a two-state treaty with the Palestinians, for example, via the Oslo Accords, he suddenly found all the media howling for his head over a blue dress. No one supported him. When it turned out that Gore was even more committed to the Oslo Accords, the media turned on the Republicans and began mocking them. I was involved in arguing, on line, for the Oslo Accords and against attacking Clinton, I remember what a lonely slog that was! Virtually no one, for three months, supported Clinton, until all the calls for him to step down and hand it off to Gore suddenly ceased and the media began to grind away at the GOP.

Proof of this was the nonstop campaign to destroy Gore when he ran for President. The media openly lied, cheated and defamed that good-natured man.

Note how both Clintons totally support Zionism today and are getting friendly press and Gore can't get any decent press coverage at all.

Mr Blair meets the media mogul two or three times a year but goes to some lengths to keep their contacts secret. The Liberal Democrat peer Lord Avebury and the journalist James Macintyre have been beavering away under the Freedom of Information Act to find out more about their discussions. They had a mini coup when the Information Commissioner ordered Downing Street to be more open. Its response, however, was to disclose that Mr Blair had "a telephone conversation with Rupert Murdoch on 13 March 2003". No 10 is arguing that "personal and political" discussions between the two men do not have to be revealed.

Conspiritors don't share information. Just like the Zionist who was ripping off Indian tribes over the gambling business, lying about his contacts, Bush and he lying about how often they met and how much money was passed between themselves, Carlyle doesn't let us hear what they talk about nor do we know anything about the bin Ladens and the Bushes and how they interact. This super-fishy business is why our empire is drowning in corruption and red ink!

No matter who we vote for, they are vetted first by a tiny handful of men who are either foreigners like Murdoch or put another country first, in this case, most often, Israel. They are very unhappy the internet gives us peons some say in what appears as news. The war being waged against the natives in the Middle East is going badly because now billions of people have access to more than a handful of outlets run by Zionists.

The story of the Liberty, a ship Israel sank and then shot up the men who tried to swim away from it, is now better and better known as it is passed around the net. The shameful cover-up the media owners performed on this amazing, gross story, is now collapsing. But even today, you can scan the entire opus of the Washington Post or the New York Times and not find one sentence about this story that tells the truth. Even with eyewitness testimony by American survivors is blacked out.

The anger people feel when reading the truth is very dangerous. The anger people feel when they learn they don't have any say in what their politicans do is very dangerous. Unlike in the past, more and more people are correctly blaming the media. Not for 'bias' but for LYING. Lying is criminal. All criminals conceal or lie. Everyone is biased but not everyone is a lying criminal!

When one sees massive demonstrations in countries and then the government goes off and does the exact opposite, one is seeing tyranny. And we are under a tyrant, here at home, and this tyrant uses various outlets to rule us.

The recent shooting of a Zionist organization in Seattle was a terrible crime. There are real, honest to god anti-semites out there and they are growing stronger and stronger thanks to the attempts of various Jews to have only their own way. The fighting in the Middle East will translate to over here. I have a Jewish ex-husband and son I love very much. I don't want to see ethnic cleansing in the Middle East or in America. This is terrible and upsets me greatly!

The media owners would be doing themselves a huge favor if they really reported the real news and not lie for Israel. When the NYT reported Rachael Corrie's murder, they strove hard to make it look like an accident which it most certainly wasn't! These lies were criminal since they were helping a murderer get off, scot free.

The shocking murder of peacekeepers is being treated the same way. Israel won't let anyone investigate anything nor will they cooperate and the media is working day and night to muddy the waters so people might think erroneously that the murders were 'accidental' and Israel was merely fighting Hezbollah.

This is making America weaker, it is destroying world peace and it won't save any Jews, it will make things worse and worse and worse. None of us should be afraid of the truth. I am calling upon the Washington Post and the New York Times to demand, yes, LOUDLY DEMAND Israel bring in international investigators to see what really happened!

And they can also check out the tanks that were supposedly on Israel's side of Lebanon's borders, when the 'kidnappings' happened.

Culture of Life News Main Page

Norwegian Cartoon Showing Olmert As Nazi Ticks Off Israel

Elaine Meinel Supkis

Oh, do I remember all those pro-Israelis mocking Muslims for being angry about cartoons mocking Allah and the Prophet! How silly they were! How super-sensitive! Free press is for civilzed people!
Now that Norway pubished a cartoon that doesn't make fun of any religious leaders but accurately protrays Olmert as a Nazi, the howls of rage from the previous pooh-poohers is deafening.

Seems the Jews in Israel have very thin skins.

Raw Story: Israel's ambassador to Norway has complained to press regulators about a cartoon showing Israeli PM Ehud Olmert as a Nazi concentration camp commander.

Miryam Shomrat told the BBC the caricature in Oslo's Dagbladet newspaper went beyond free speech.

Ms Shomrat said it would be open to prosecution in some European countries.

Thank you, Ms. Neo Nazi Shomrat! This reminds us all that Israel has gotten several countries to pass laws preventing people from discussing the Holocaust! Over the years, online, I have argued with many a rabid, right wing racist Zionist. They all like to eliminate all oppostion in various nasty, ugly ways. Mostly, if the forum is run by Jewish leftists, they get anyone who argues back, banned. The Democratic Underground is a prime example of such a website that is supposedly 'liberal' but really isn't at all.

For they hate huge hunks of the Constitution, especially the 'freedom of speech' clause. Many Jews were for the Civil Rights Act because they were a minority that was discriminated against. Now that they are in control of many parts of our government, they want to have a dual system where some people are better than others. This is how Israel is run. They are willing to make a deal with right wing Christians to set up a dual state here which is why the wall seperating Church and State is under nearly total assault from 'liberals' as well as 'conservatives.'

Even THREATENING the publishers of a newspaper in NORWAY with ARREST is morally depraved. I hope all Jews in America denounce the ambassador for daring to do this and make her apologize----hahaha. Will never happen! Never. Israel and American Jews stalk all over Europe, holding the Holocaust axe over everyone's head. They can't understand this is going to cause great problems in the future, especially since they are tearing little children apart with American bombs this very same time!

And I hope all the bloggers, and I do mean ALL, who attacked Muslims for being upset about cartoons, apologize. Profusely. Oops. So it IS OK to threaten cartoonists! Whoopsie!

Meanwhile, the neo Nazi Olmert continues his terror campaign, driving out all the civilians living on the borders of his giant ghetto.

MSNBC: The United States and Britain opposed the push for a quick cease-fire, saying any truce should ensure that Hezbollah no longer is a threat to Israel and should ensure a durable peace.

Referring to the cease-fire, D’Alema said, “To obtain this objective, you must exercise pressure on all parties involved, directly and indirectly, on who can exercise influence on Hezbollah and on Israel.”

The foreign ministers and other senior officials from the 15 nations, as well as Annan and representatives from the European Union and the World Bank, agreed on a declaration expressing “deep concern” for the many civilian casualties in Lebanon, where government officials say hundreds have been killed.

So, a cartoonist showing an accurate portrayal of a fascist leader should be arrested but all Europe's leaders can do about the illegal invasion of a soveriegn nation (Israel did NOT declare war, prove a soldier was shot on their side of the border OR lodge formal protests at the UN!) is wring their pitiful, lily hands and sob, 'Oh, I am so concerned!'?

Excuse me, tell it to the weeping mothers! Stand in the rubble of Beirut and say it with feeling. Arf.

As for 'direct and indirect influence' on Israel and Hezbollah, why can't Europe boycott the USA and force our country to stop shipping bombs and jet fuel to the invaders (absolutely no one is invading Israel)? This would get our attention! But of course, we are all allies which is why the next magic number day will feature more Europeans going 'blooie' as this grinding war goes on and on and on. It won't end with the Muslims staying home since they can't stay at home, someone is bulldozing their homes down on a daily basis for years and years! Ergo: they have to fight back, they have no choice.

Time for Iran to step in and play peacemaker.

By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV, Associated Press Writer 12 minutes ago
DUSHANBE, Tajikistan - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for a cease-fire in Lebanon and criticized U.S. policy in the Middle East on Wednesday, saying Washington wants to "recarve the map" of the region with Israel's help.

Ahmadinejad's nation is a major backer of Hezbollah and a sworn enemy of Israel, but he denied that Tehran provides military support to the militant group, saying Iran only supports it politically and morally.

"Those who say that we provide military support for Hezbollah are lying. That is the way for America to cover up its failures," he said through an interpreter.

Israel has been carefully recarving the map for years. They 'gave back' the Sinai Desert because it didn't have anything they needed. So long as Egypt is run by an American puppet, Isreal is safe. If it changes hands, Israel simply retakes it. But the Jews in Israel who run things want a lot of stuff and they are getting it, orchard by orchard, street by street as they relentlessly drive out the near helpless Palestinians. This process of 'giving back' the more worthless parts and keeping the parts the Jewish colonists lust for is at the root of these disorders. Duh. And this process has been extraordinarily vicious. I have seen videos of house attacks, rock throwing, car destructions, petty harrassments, all sorts of ugly, personal behavior as the Jews use the police as protection while they drive out Palestinians.

None of this, and there is a lot of video proof taken by peace activists, ever appears on American TV or in any American publication. Nor do pictures of Olmert as a Nazi. Which reminds me, all the major American media made fun of the Muslims being pissed off over the Mohammed cartoons.

They better apologize.

Culture of Life News Main Page

New York Times Thinks Violent Invasion Of Lebanon Is Great Opportunity

Elaine Meinel Supkis

The New York Times publishes an editorial written by an alien (non-Muslim, too) living part time in Lebanon in order to have a finely finessed article justifying Israel's totally illegal invasion of Lebanon. Of course, the paper Mr. Young edits has its own editorial calling this invasion an 'opportunity' for diplomacy! I guess Hitler's invasions were all great diplomatic possibilities, right?

Of course, the NYT won't have an editorial written by a Palestinian nationalist.

By MICHAEL YOUNG
Published: July 14, 2006

ISRAEL’S incursion into Lebanon after the kidnapping on Wednesday of two Israeli soldiers by the militant group Hezbollah is far more than another flare-up on a tense border. It must also be seen as a spinoff of a general counterattack against American and Israeli power in the region by Iran and Syria, operating through sub-state actors like Hezbollah and the Palestinian organization Hamas.

If America and its Security Council partners are smart, however, they may be able to use this crisis to further their security goals in the Middle East, and to help Lebanon climb out of its political morass.

Goebbels was a genius but not this smart. He should have used this sort of reasoning to justify invading Poland. Oh, wait, he did. Europe, nay, the world was stuck in a 'morass' called the Great Depression and Hitler believed that using his methods, it would end with victory and peace. Eliminating pesky people was necessary for the New World Order, richtig? Ja.

How bombing Beirut is going to fix anything in Lebanon is sheer insanity. It would be like my neighbor, to stop the kids from throwing rocks while our neighbor tortures the wife, beating her mercilessly whenever she raises a hand to her tormentor husband, were to turn around and burn down my own house.

To bring peace, there has to be justice and there is no justice in the Middle East since the entire premise for establishing Israel was due to Hitler's attempts at fixing the Great Depression by murdering and stealing from Jews and anyone else he could corner and attack! The belief that Jews could colonize a region long settled by other people for over two thousand years, is OK because Hitler's insane policies were destructive is...insane. Jews were always free to move to the Middle East so long as they didn't try to usurp the present systems and establish a religious dicatatorship.

The struggle of the victims of this scam keeps causing wars. The Jews had to justify the disarmament of all their victims because 'they are fighting back' which is bad if it is the inhabitants of the region but a virtue if Jews arm themselves to the teeth and use these arms at the slightest provocation. This is why Jews regularily murder small boys throwing rocks or worse, murder little girls sitting in their homes or hanging laundry. Or murder families on the beach, all these violent actions are excused by the major media in America and in American run media in places like Lebanon.

People ask me why don't the Palestinians do what Gandhi did?

Gandhi didn't free India at all. Not even slightly. The Germans and Japanese freed India by making it impossible for the British Empire to exist. Churchill had no desire to part with India and was furious when it happened and he egged on the empire to continue to rule the seven seas even as the last British ships were falling into rust.

Gandhi was against partitioning India. He failed there, too, and millions died. The other problem with peaceful protest is, it matters not if the media looks the other way, lies, conceals facts or demonizes the demonstrators, all of which has been done to Americans who demonstrate against policies the media owners endorse.

When I marched in Washington, DC, before the Gulf War, it was barely above zero yet we had almost half a million people show up and the media fled hours before the march began after reporting few showed up.

Luckily, many of us had taken pictures and we put them online. I remember when Muslims in Manhattan filled all of 42nd Street from end to end. Right in front of the headquarters of all our major media.

NOT ONE REPORTED IT. I learned only from a friend online who took photos from his office windows. There was nothing, otherwise, and if you google this story, you will find nearly nothing. Peaceful protests when the ones running things ignore you, are a waste of time when a serious situation arises. The spiralling war in the Middle East requires sharp attention. We won't see anything here since America is pretending, even as we egg this on, we have 'no control' over events.

This is a lie. We could cut funds to Israel's war machine and then guarantee the peace after giving the Muslims some justice. This will never happen. So we have to consider what will happen.

What to do? While the United Nations has been ineffective in its efforts toward Middle East peace, it may be the right body to intervene here, if only because it has the cudgel of Security Council Resolution 1559, which was approved in 2004 and, among other things, calls for Hezbollah’s disarmament.

The five permanent Security Council members, perhaps at this weekend’s Group of 8 meeting, should consider a larger initiative based on the resolution that would include: a proposal for the gradual collection of Hezbollah’s weapons; written guarantees by Israel that it will respect Lebanese sovereignty and pull its forces out of the contested Lebanese land in the Shebaa Farms; and the release of prisoners on both sides. Such a deal could find support among Lebanon’s anti-Syrian politicians, would substantially narrow Hezbollah’s ability to justify retaining its arms, and also send a signal to Syria and particularly Iran that the region is not theirs for the taking.

Only Israel may take lands. The building of the wall is taking lands strictly from Palestinians. The unilateral siezure of the West Bank is taking lands. The problem isn't peace between Israel and Egypt or Lebanon but peace between the Jewish colonizers and the natives living in Palestine. Until this is resolved and it can't be resolved by disarming the natives unless one is talking like Hitler, there will be no peace.

The abuse of the disarmament idea is key to all the troubles we are seeing. We got the UN to disarm Iraq and then we invaded, very bloodily. The Iraqi people, betrayed by Saddam's generals, fought alone against a nuclear power using DU arms to blow them away. We bombed many civilians as well as military and then, when we marched in, we continued to kill them.

There was a flurry of peaceful demonstrations. Some threw their sandals at us. We shot them dead. Once the Iraqis figured we were there to act like agents from Israel, even trying to bring in Israeli agents to show us how to abuse Arabs, they fought back tooth and nail. Each month, they grow increasingly violent. We are about to totally lose control there.

Everyone is trying to flee Bagdad.

By James Hider, of The Times, from Baghdad

As I hung up the phone, I wondered if I would ever see my friend Ali alive again. Ali, The Times translator for the past three years, lives in west Baghdad, an area that is now in meltdown as a bitter civil war rages between Sunni insurgents and Shia militias. It is, quite simply, out of control.
I returned to Baghdad on Monday after a break of several months, during which I too was guilty of glazing over every time I read another story of Iraqi violence. But two nights on the telephone, listening to my lost and frightened Iraqi staff facing death at any moment, persuaded me that Baghdad is now verging on total collapse.

Ali phoned me on Tuesday night, about 10.30pm. There were cars full of gunmen prowling his mixed neighbourhood, he said. He and his neighbours were frantically exchanging information, trying to identify the gunmen.

This tragedy was caused by the abuse of disarmament protocols. Everyone knows our desire to disarm Iran is simply so Israel can unilaterally intimidate everyone and do as they please. The lust for the lands occupied by natives overrides all considerations. We are witnessing a world wide nuclear arms race. The American media never connects the dots of our own, internal arms race, how we are building more and more WMD systems and how this makes a mockery of all our wails for disarmament. England did this before WWI. There were various treaties drawn up to stop an arms race, building navies, before it all blew up. The Brits insisted they keep a 40% total of all world fleets since they 'ruled the seven seas.' The only way to challenge them was to fight.

So Germany lunged at them and nearly brought them down except for American ship building which undid the worst of the U Boat damage. It was even closer in WWII. If Hitler had not decided to kill the Jews, Germany might have won that war but Hitler was insane as well as hideously malicious.

As I pointed out here, he spent more energy seeking out young Jewish Dutch girls writing dairies than fighting the Soviets.

America has nothing to gain from the disarmament of the Muslims. Indeed, we are losing a lot. Our stock markets are falling, inflation is chewing off our legs and the world price of oil is shooting up and up and up.

Here is a closing editorial from Mr. Young's English Lebanonese newspaper today:

Some people like to wax proverbial about the fact that many Chinese use the same word to describe both crisis and opportunity. Few get the chance to test the implications of that fact, but Lebanon has an opportunity to try. Israel's steadily mounting military response to Hizbullah's capture of two soldiers inside the Jewish state has already imposed human and financial costs that a tiny country like Lebanon can ill afford. Since the damage thus far is still relatively small when compared to that to be expected if and when Israel unleashes the full weight of its might, things can easily get far worse unless cooler heads prevail. With luck and forethought, however, the deeply worrisome situation might still be retrieved to the benefit of all parties.

What benefit for Lebanon? So the city people can crush the peasants there? And why should Israel 'unleash the full weight' in this matter? Lebanon didn't sieze any territory. Israel has invaded Lebanon before. Not the other way around! This whole thing reads like something written by Chamberlain in 1938.

Culture of Life News Main Page