Ron Paul Riot Chasing Stupid Hannity CENSORED By Media

January 7, 2008

Elaine Meinel Supkis

Fox TV, a Murdoch operation working for the New World Order has decided to black out Ron Paul's candidacy. Justifiably outraged Ron Paul supporters have gone after Fox TV for inviting Guilliani, a dead candidate crawling, while refusing to allow Ron Paul who had more than twice the support as the NY Ghoul. As usual, I went to the main news services to see if they are reporting this near-riot that chased the neo-tool, Hannity, down the street in New Hampshire. Nearly nothing! It is obvious the zits running our media have decided to even black out RIOTS! How amusing. The Revolution will NOT be televised!

by Mike Whitney | January 7, 2008 - 1:45pm

FOX News did a great job of removing the only Republican from the debate (Ron Paul) who was not a member of the traitorous Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Too bad they hadn't anticipated the angry mob outside that was waiting to show their appreciation.

It's funny watching the bilious Hannity waddle down the streets of Manchester as fast as his two pudgy-little legs will carry him trying to dodge the slurs and brickbats from the angry Paul supporters. The only thing missing was a bucket of tar-n-feathers.

Mike emailed me tonight and I was most delighted to see this news and online, it was all over the 'conspiracy' parts but as per the New World Order, it was blacked out in the mainstream media nearly 100%! I love it when the multi-faceted parts of our Pravda All The Time acts in total concert to wipe out history and deny reality.

Of course, they have lots and lots of practice doing exactly that. Ron Paul's supporters know that if they are very, very loud and very, very rude, they will get on TV. NOT! Not even this will get them one minute of mainstream time, not even to mock them and call them names.

I remember the Summer of Love and the aftermath in San Francisco. The media featured even me, I made the cover of Newsweek once, for example. We hippies were photographed and interviewed and I loved to say, 'Yes, I believe in free love but you have to pay for the sex.' This grossed out the male reporters who instantly wanted to know how much I wanted aside from a joint or a dinner or perhaps some really nice gear from Afghanistan along with...hahaha. Afghanistan was the happy destination of many of us back then. But then everyone hates hippies but the Afghanis loved us and were very, very kind to us. Sigh.

Back to reality: the near-riot normally would make the news only like in the sixties, kids would be dragged to San Francisco to sneer at the hippies only they were in love with us and frowning parents would tell their kids, I was the Whore of Babylon and then ten minutes later, the same kids would sneak away and run to me, screaming, 'Take me! Take me home with you!' I was aghast.

Well, I found it very funny. But the clowns running the media today learned to not talk about any of the revolutionary or wild stuff for fear their children will join so they have a new way of dealing with us: we don't exist. We can strip down and yell, 'I love to LOOOOOVE Ron Paul' while throwing rocks at the media whores and this won't make the news.

Reminds me how we used to get the media to come to us. Heh. Braless and then half naked at the age of 19 works wonders. Today, I could see them censoring me. But back then, they loved to show us.

Enjoy the Ron Paul riots here. Thank goodness for You Tube.

Click here to see the near-total blackout in the news concerning this near-riot.

I tried another way of wording things and still, near total black-out!

Culture of Life News Main Page

Comments

[shargash]

Olbermann did a segment on it on MSNBC tonight.

[Elaine Supkis]

Thanks, Shargash. He is the Alternative Media at this point. He is one of the few 'outsiders' who is allowed to be 'inside.' Good for him, as always.

[Al]

Stan Goff had a good article re: Ron Paul yesterday in Counterpunch.

http://www.counterpunch.org/goff01042008.html

[Alex]

Youtube clips of the 1) Hannity run and 2) the crowds on the streets of Manchester protesting the Ron Paul's ban by FOX:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9p9uBLqz958

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-BWTDmjluIA

[Umberto]

Four months ago I could search for Ron Paul on Google and get 250,000,000 hits, a similar return from Yahoo, Today Google returns 9,000,000, this is up from two weeks ago when it dropped to about 5,000,000.
Yahoo still returns 250,000,000.

I wonder if the Ron Paul people flying the blimp which says "Google Ron Paul" know this?

And as for the ABC in Good ol Oz, a search for Sibel Edmonds returns absolute ZERO!!

After all, it is called a CORPORATION.

[Elaine Supkis]

I know exactly how it feels to be 'disappeared.' Google definitely does this. For example, at one point, Google made me totally vanish and had pictures of a gagged woman in place of the usual 'image' search! I was horrified. Then, just as capriciously, three months later, my pictures showed up again but only past ones, not anything I have posted since that day.

They pretend they have anonymous searchers filing information. This is a total lie.

[Greg]

Wow the sibel edmonds thing is hot, that really needs pushing!!!!!!!!!

[CK]

The % of people who obtain their knowledge of the world from TV and deadtree media is decreasing at an increasing rate. In 1968, there were three Gatekeepers in TV and maybe three or four in large cities controlling the editorial and reportorial content of the sources of information for 100% of the population. In smaller towns there was maybe one gatekeeper. In 1988 the number of gatekeepers had grown a bit with the advent of cable TV for the masses, but each gatekeeper had sway over a smaller section of the total audience. In 2008, the number of gatekeepers is now about 15 for that percentage of the population that trusts TV or newspapers or NPR. For the 30-40% who do not even watch TV or subscribe to a newspaper there are a huge number of gatekeepers and we pick and choose amongst them. Applying the "skin in the game" theory, the gatekeepers in the mass media have a lot more at stake as their pie gets smaller and their influence dwindles. So Hannity goes trolling down the street knowing that Dr. Paul's supporters are out there. He also knew that the worst danger he faced was having folks yell rude things at him. Imagine him trying to do that in Kenya or Pakistan.
And while I am venting, what the hell is a Dr. Phil?

[JSmith]

I'd say the reason the Hannity Riot wasn't covered is that you see far bigger riots outside Toys-R-Us on the day after Thanksgiving.

The Paultards remind me of the LaRouchers who were around 15 or 20 years ago - totally committed total loons.

"Stan Goff had a good article re: Ron Paul yesterday in Counterpunch."

Stan Goff notes (3rd paragraph): "No one listens to me much..." and then goes on to demonstrate why.

[Elaine Supkis]

Um, Smith, politics is all about the streets. I know this from life experience.

If Fox wanted this as big news, it would be all over the place.

IT IS NOT. It is nearly totally cloaked by the media. Ron Paul makes all these verminous villains very angry and very scared. And his followers scare them even more.

What if other people get as difficult and angry? I see a very angry crowd looming in the future.

[CK]

So do the MSM prognosticators but the one they see is the angry crowd that will eventuate if Obama is denied. They do not see a similar crowd if Hillary is denied, or if Dr. Paul is denied.
Watching Hannity do his Troll-walk was fun.
Here in the virtual world we only get to see troll-bashing we never get to see it run away.

[JSmith]

"Um, Smith, politics is all about the streets."

Oh, come on - a dozen people in Manchester bitching at Hannity isn't "the streets". Chicago-'68 was "the streets".

Meanwhile, RP polled 7.6% in NH - not exactly a groundswell.