Media News

AIPAC Cheers Cheney And There Is Only ONE News Story

Click on all pictures to enlarge

This is a screen shot of the NYT search engine for any news about the AIPAC mass-gathering this week.

Elaine Meinel Supkis

All Democratic candidates for President along with Cheney, cheered AIPAC this week. They were all begging for money and nice media attention and note how Cheney is virtually never mentioned in the press these days? And the media made fun of Valarie Plame? Well, this is why! AIPAC loves Cheney.

AIPAC rules DC and the airwaves.

By Gregory Levey (Salon)

Mar. 16, 2007 | At the annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee this week in Washington, a conservative Christian couple from eastern Tennessee told me that their son had decided to join the Israeli army. It was one of many surreal moments during the three-day gathering hosted by AIPAC, the lobbying group devoted to ensuring close U.S.-Israel ties that remains extraordinarily influential in Washington. "We just love God, and we just love Israel," the couple beamed, when I asked why they had come to the conference.

Amid an energized and at times almost circuslike atmosphere, just about everyone in attendance shared two main preoccupations: the 2008 U.S. presidential election and confronting Iran. And this year's conference saw record attendance: more than 6,000 people, coming from every state in the country and exceeding last year's crowd of around 5,000. Many of them were American Jews, of course, but the evangelical Christian community also made a strong showing. For those feeling apocalyptic about the turmoil in the Middle East, pastor John Hagee was there to greet them. Of the many prominent speakers at the conference, Hagee got one of the most enthusiastic receptions.

"The sleeping giant of Christian Zionism has awoken!" Hagee proclaimed, taking the microphone at the opening dinner reception on Sunday. The electrified crowd -- most of it Jewish -- roared in support, pounding on the tables. Hagee went on to declare the United Nations a "political brothel" and asserted that Israel must never give up land. He agreed with Israeli writer Dore Gold that granting part of Jerusalem to the Palestinians would be "tantamount to turning it over to the Taliban." And, after rebuking Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, he led the crowd in a chant of "Israel lives!" urging them to "shout it from the mountaintops!"

At first I was going to write about the how deranged many Jewish people have become, embracing lunatics who are actively working to create the Apocalypse so they can kill all the Jews or force them to love a vicious Jesus who will kill anyone who doesn't love him. After all, nothing is possibly worse than the ultimate plans these rank anti-semites have. They are, to be blunt, Nazis.

But the right wing Jews have embraced Naziism. So I suppose they are the same thing at this point. Only the Jews want to destroy Islam. So make this a three-way death-a-thon: the Muslims hate the Jews who hate them and the Christians plan to kill everyone. Right? Good.

But aside from that bizarre triple decker death-wish, we have something much more annoying here: I tried to look up stories about Cheney, Mr. Invisible VP. He has been hiding from us for quite a while. But not from AIPAC! Far from hiding from them, he stalks amoungst them as a conquering hero because he wants non-stop wars with people Israeli Jews (there are non-Jews in Israel so I will not call these warmongers 'Israelis' since that implies Muslims in Israel are the same, this is strictly a Jewish thing) want to kill or suppress or destroy.

Cheney was a big hit at the biggest bash to occur so far this year in DC: AIPAC's annual Nüremberg Wanna Be Fest. Seig Heil! So, I decided to google more stories besides the Salon story and so I went to the NYT and clicked on their search engine and got this:

OK. So none of the thousands of Jewish readers of the New York Times, some of whom definitely give to AIPAC or are on some of AIPAC's committees, didn't want to know about this convention, right? HAHAHA. And the Jewish owners of the New York Times didn't know about AIPAC's little...talk about Shadowlands!

Shadowlands is this disgusting, dark place where people doing all sorts of extremely violent and dangerous stuff gather. They have these cloaking devices that prevent others from seeing them. The CIA is 100% shadowlands. Cheney is in trouble for uncovering Valerie Plame's shadow world, for example.

But this stuff is cloaked because the very violent Israel-supporting Jews in the USA don't want anyone to know how they have utterly corrupted the government and openly bribe politicians to work for Israel and not the USA.

In other words, they are foreign agents that get Congress, while cutting funds to New Orleans, will give them to illegal Jewish settlers to resettle them on stolen Palestinian lands! At this nearly totally hidden convention attended by NEARLY ALL AMERICAN POLITICIANS IN DC, they all worried about 'giving part of Jerusalem to the Muslims,'---isn't that some cheek? Like as if people living in that city for the last 1,000 years have no right to live there at all? Seig Heil, Moses.

Did the army of American politicians march out in disgust when this was said there? And what color is a dollar bill? Excuse me, but this is rank treason as well as...bribes are killing our democracy. The AIPAC aliens even boast about how they have corrupted both parties equally. Quite.

In rather a rage, I went to the Washington Post to search them for any mention of this totally public yet utterly secret convention. Here is a screen shot:

Nearly nothing. Froomkin has, on page 5 today, on his BLOG, a paragraph from the Salon article. No commentary. But at least he had the grace to mention it off handedly, sort of.

Here is one of the very, very few articles about this convention by a Jewish publication:

Cheney's appeal is part of Bush-administration efforts in recent months to shore up support for the Iraq war in quarters it once took for granted: Republicans in Congress, the Christian right and now the pro-Israel community.

His message was not received enthusiastically: Only about one-third to one-half of the audience in the cavernous Washington Convention Center hall applauded politely.

Behind Cheney, some AIPAC board members sat stone-faced, including Amy Friedkin, a past AIPAC president who is close to Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives and a fierce critic of the administration's handling of the war.

It's not just that three-quarters of American Jews -- more than any other religious group -- now think the Iraq war was a mistake. That's partly due to perceptions that the war's failure has emboldened Iran and its nuclear ambitions, which AIPAC considers the gravest challenge to Israel.

Cheney's speech was jarring because the tone of this year's meeting was to have been emphatically bipartisan -- even more than normal for AIPAC, the powerhouse lobby that prides itself on crossing party lines.

This article strives to pretend Cheney wasn't popular at all and most of the AIPAC owners of our Congress are anti-Iraq war but look at Congress: they can't pass even a mild rebuke to Bush about increasing the war! Nor will more than two or three dare say something about not attacking Iran! So I wanted more points of view about simple facts: did or did not these Jewish/right wing Nazi Christians applaud wildly or not?

Here is a Muslim site that only cites Salon:

America's powerful Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), held a recent summit that featured moments described by one writer as "surreal," "energized" and even "circuslike."

"AIPAC's three-day summit included fiery evangelical oratory, adoration for Dick Cheney -- and new plans for going after Iran," reports Gregory Levey for Salon.

When I used the Google 'news of the day' search, normally big meetings that feature 90% of Washington DC's power elites including the nearly never in public Cheney would have 2-3000 stories from AP on down. But lo and behold! There were only three or four and most tellingly, several JOKE sites like the stupid Wonkette and the even dumber Onion.

Hahaha. Laugh, laugh, laugh. So, we had this massive meeting of corrupt money weilded in proxy by a foreign nation that has attracted an army of American politicians and they talked about WARS? And this isn't NEWS????

What the effing HELL is going on here? Today, thousands of Americans and people across the planet demonstrated against the Iraq war. This did make the news this time. But no mention that many of these demonstrators want no war with Iran, too. Again, the super-cloaking device that hides reality went to work.

Here is the Zionist neo-con of the Washington Post, whining about people calling Cheney 'insane':

By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, March 16, 2007; Page A21

"What is wrong with Dick Cheney?" asks Michelle Cottle in the inaugural issue of the newly relaunched New Republic. She then spends the next 1,900 words marshaling evidence suggesting that his cardiac disease has left him demented and mentally disordered.

What were the chances that Krauthammer, a notorious Zionist supporter of AIPAC, was at that little lovefest? 100%? Or more? And did he talk about this? No?

The need to conceal true intentions is a sure fire sign of criminality. And we can plainly see there are many criminals and I would say, quite a number of traitors in DC. And note that many so-called 'liberals' in the Democratic party never seem to get their asses into gear to pass campaign finance laws that eliminate the power of lobbies like this notorious and dangerous group!

This is why our media coverage is like swiss cheese: there are many holes in the cheese and these are so many in number, one can see straight through it. The cheese is our democracy and unfortunately, it is being hollowed out rapidly by criminals, thieves and traitors.

Ever since the Baker/Hamilton commission tried to bring some sanity to our Near Eastern disasters, the AIPAC crowd has been hard at work destroying any possibility of any diplomacy with any of the people or nations we are at odds with. This is why they are very, very anxious to start a shooting war with Iran and Syria. They know time is running against them as more and more people become disgusted with the ethnic/religious cleansing going on in the misnamed 'Holy Land'.

Hiding their activities with the help of their brethern and sistern (sic) in the media isn't going to make things turn out fabulous with the Jewish community. Instead, this will cause the second Holocaust and the allies who are rapidly infilitrating AIPAC, the Nazi-leaning right wing Christians, will be the leaders and executioners of this new Holocaust.

And AIPAC isn't hidden from these people! They are INSIDE! They are seeing everything, hearing everything and they will take everything and turn it into a sword and run it right through the bellies of the Jewish leadership!

How can anyone not see this? It is painfully obvious to me. The Jewish community has to denounce AIPAC and quickly disband it and tell the Jews colonizing Israel, they must do this on their own dime. And no one in America should have divided loyalties. Just like my German half of my own family: in WWI and WWII, we were 100% for the USA. Not one bit for Germany. We fought Germany. My father even entered Germany as an OSS officer.

And this is what patriotism is all about and I despise ALL the politicians who sold their flag so dearly to a foreign power.

APPENDIX TO THIS STORY:

Kristof, in tomorrow's NYT editorial page, talks about Israel and our politicians they own.

Whether they have "learned to muzzle themselves" or they "just don't get it," US politicians should stop biting their tongues when it comes to Israel, New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristof argues in Sunday's paper.

"Democrats are railing at just about everything President Bush does, with one prominent exception: Bush's crushing embrace of Israel," Kristof writes.

And since "[t]here is no serious political debate among either Democrats or Republicans about our policy toward Israelis and Palestinians," Kristof believes, the "silence harms America, Middle East peace prospects and Israel itself."

See how this invisibility works? This Jewish editorialist (how unusual!) pretends he cannot for the life of himself, understand why our politicians (he does NOT mention the media) cannot critisize Israel even slightly. How droll.

Was this man at the AIPAC convention? Were any NYT editorialists and reporters there at all? Didn't any invitations go out to them and their families and friends and business cohorts? Was it that...hahaha. Of course. Our politicians mysteriously cannot talk about Israel or support Palestine or demand Israel not drop bombs on schools and orphanages in Lebanon. I remember that war: the entire political class from top to bottom aside from a tiny, tiny handful of mavericks, joined with Israel in denouncing Hezbollah alone.

And this is due to a simple fact: people serve those who pay them and those who put them in power and the New York Times and all the other media outlets support only tools of Zionism. They attack anyone else with tremendous fury to the point of, as in the case of Gore and Carter, lying about them and making up quotes and in general, acting like Scientologists.

Shame of Kristof. He should go back to whining about Darfur and buying prostitutes in Cambodia.

Culture of Life News Main Page

The Media Is Now Taking Down Bush Just Like Nixon

We have had fake elections since the 2000 mess. This was due to both the Republicans cheating and using rigged voting machines and purging minorities from polling lists and the Supreme Court simply cancelling an election entirely, all the right wing Republicans there voting to not count the votes. And the media helped them steal these elections. Now the media, working for rich people, are hammering Bush over all this. Har.

The media is happily hammering away at Bush.

(CBS/AP) One of the eight recently fired U.S. attorneys at the center of a growing political scandal tells CBS News that he lost his job because he "did not play ball" with powerful Republicans.

"I believe, and I think all my colleagues believe, the real reason is partisan politics," the former U.S. Attorney for the District of New Mexico, David Iglesias told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric. "I believe I was fired because I did not play ball with two members of the Republican delegation here in New Mexico. I did not give them privileged information that could have been used in the October and November time frame."

I have a long memory. I can even remember three months ago. Back then, the media was dissing Valarie Plame and the prosecutor in the case where, anxious to launch a totally illegal invasion for oil and Israel, the USA was desperately cooking up false charges against Saddam. Plame's husband, ambassador Wilson, blew out the gaskets of the war machine by telling the truth about the alleged 'Yellow Cake' documents which were total forgeries.

During the run up to the war, we yelled about these forgeries and we said, there was no proof Saddam had any WMD. The uproar caused by us protesters across the entire earth forced the UN to send in inspectors who found absolutely nothing so Bush invaded anyway.

This invasion is the big crime. All others are auxillary. But the bigger crime was the theft of the 2000 election. The media is complicit in this crime. When they should have been hammering away at BUSH to get the votes in Florida counted properly, when they should have assured the American people, counting votes is more important than rushing to victory and if it took a year to count the votes, so be it.

Nor did the media yell for election reforms! They hammmered on GORE to give it up! They CHEERED when the Supreme Court nixed the election and Time magazine even had the temerity to have a huge headline, 'Constitutional Crisis Avoided!' just as the Consitution was rippped to shreds and the Supreme Court amazingly announced, one couldn't cite 'Bush vs Gore' as precedent for anything! Astonishing.

We were told to shut up. We demanded the media report the national tally of that election, namely, which candidate got the most votes, overall. They refused. They refused because it clearly showed Gore got the most votes! Behind the scenes, writers online like myself fought daily battles with these monsters and they refused to tell the American people the simple fact that Al Gore won the popular vote even without the disputed Florida ballots!

And to get those counted, the media promised us they would form a consortium and count the votes for us. But when they saw that Gore clearly won Florida, they held off reporting about it. Finally, they said they would release the data on September 12, 2001.

After 9/11, they refused to release the data and held it for two more months and then released a lie: Bush really won. They refused to show us the actual data because they were lying. And in the run up to the next elections, they lied about nearly everything.

When not two but FIVE districts using Republican-owned electronic voting machines reported the GOP candidates for the House won by votes of 18181 each, the media had a little story saying, 'Two districts for the first time in histroy, had the same tallies in an election.' When it turned out to be five, we said, 'This is no coincidence, this is a sign that someone rigged the votes!' On top of all this, that is a hyper-harmonic magic number so beloved by the Skull and Bones.

The media turned off its hearing aids and refused to listen to us. Then we had the rigged 2004 election. The media frankly told us to shut the hell up. Bush won, hahaha. Well, here comes tons of proof it was rigged by the GOP and the lawyer mess is all about being asked to rig the election and to leak stories to the press attacking only Democratic candidates, etc.

Like with Nixon, we knew he cheated on his elections, grossly. With tons of help from the media. This is why our candidate for office in Nixon's second election lost. The media hid the truth about McGovern's heroic war past while elevating Nixon's own past (sound familiar?) and they hid Nixon's drinking and cursing while finding every tiny flaw in his opponent and focusing only on these 'flaws' and exaggerating everything while ho-humming Nixon's obvious stuff like the Watergate break-in which we knew during the election was co-ordinated by him because he was an OBVIOUS control freak like Bush.

But the media savagely attacked us, not Nixon. They celebrated his great victory which was a conspiracy between rich media owners and he. The war in Vietnam was disintigrating badly and they all acted as if America wanted that war-monger, Nixon, to lead us.

Then Nixon refused to fight for Israel. He did cooperate with covering up the fact that the Israelis shot down the Liberty and machinegunned the survivors. But the owners of the media were frowning on him now. Then the economy pancaked.

Suddenly there were investigations all over the place and the media which was hither to, deaf to anything bad about Nixon suddenly became a spring flood of breaking news as he retreated from his wage-PRICE controls that so infuriated the rich, it was too late because the stock market tanked...badly and for several long years.

So the media discovered reality. I laughed at the time with full scorn. I had no TV because it fed nothing but lies but I bought a set for the Watergate Hearings. It was dark amusement. Pregnant with my first child, I was very sick and had to be kept in bed so I wouldn't miscarry. So I wrote letters to the editor and watched those hearings like a hawk.

I will note here how the Washington Post, a ruling-elite's war-mongering rag suddenly broke one story after another. Nixon correctly saw this as a Jewish conspiracy which it was in some ways. He cursed them but then the cursing its self, suddenly made the news and down the tubes he slid and out the door with the press howling all the way.

So we see again: when Bush was offering huge tax cuts and huge no-pay-back loans to Israel and gave Israel a green light to torture Palestinians and starve them to death in ghettoes and attack whomever they wish and the invasion of Iraq on their behalf, etc, the media saw nothing wrong as he committed one crime after another, the invasion of Iraq being the most hideous of these crimes.

When we expected the media to write stories of this scandal or another like the male sex whore who was brought into the White House with the gaggle of press geese, Gannon, the media pretended we were hallucinating. They then attacked us and defended Gannon and pretended he was being wrongly defamed. When gay bloggers outed him and had photographic proof he was a prostitute and we demanded the White House release records of all his overnight stays, the media attacked the gay bloggers like at Americablog and tried to defame THEM!

This happened over and over again just like when a team we had at Salon uncovered Bush going AWOL: the media refused to carry the story, then they attacked us by name, personally (they even misspelled my own name not once but several times, heh) the New York Times even curtly told me, 'You have to prove where he WAS during those years you say he was AWOL.' which was sheer nonsense. The media refused to raise a storm about this and when the storm over his drunk driving (much less, the coke) arrests broke, the media itself defended Bush and praised his 'honesty' in talking about it when he was actually lying about it and they worked with him to pretend his drunken daughters would be devastated to learn, daddy drank like a fish at home, too.

Which reminds me of the first anthrax victim: the photo-editor for the Sun in Florida who was the man who OKed the infamous Jenna drunk photos. This was so obviously a case of revenge pulled by the former head of the CIA, it isn't funny. Never, ever do the media mention this happanstance. Why would the first victim of the obviously political anthrax assassin be this totally obscure and odd person that only the Bushes had a grudge against?

And in the 2004 election with an AWOL President running a messed-up invasion versus a war hero (again!), the media hammered Dan Rather because he fell for a classic Karl Rove trick when he was fed a possibly fake document concerning Bush's AWOL status. We knew Bush was an AWOL but the media joined right wing bloggers in attacking only Dan Rather and protecting or concealing Bush's dirty secrets. They did it well enough to allow him to steal yet another election.

So many crimes, so little attention. This is deliberate: the media owners and the rich want to chase Bush out of office because he is profoundly unpopular now. And the economy is going off the cliff. And they need a silent coup and nothing is better than to chase him and his crew out of DC and replace them with tools of the rich who are bland like Ford was vis a vis Nixon.

They so NOT want anyone to go to prison. This might lead to spilling of beans they, themselves, are holding. Many of them are traitors and criminals themselves and the last thing they want is for people to apply the law to THEM. So everyone is going to pretend all is well just like after Watergate, with the retreat of the criminals back into the Shadows.

Unlike in the Seventies, though, the economic mess this time is much worse and much more dangerous.

Culture of Life News Main Page

Gore's Documentary Wins 2 Oscars

Elaine Meinel Supkis

Due to too little time, I didn't write about the wonderful news that Inconvenient Al Gore's documentary won 2 Oscars. This is so satisfying. Congratulations, Al! I will always love you. But the media fell silent when this happened including much of the big 'liberal' blogs.

The Environmental News Wire carried this important story:

(ENS) - Former Vice President Al Gore won the Oscar for Best Documentary for his climate change warning film "An Inconvenient Truth," last night at the 79th Annual Academy Awards, highlighting a night devoted to environmental awareness.

In fact, the award went to director Davis Guggenheim and producers Lawrence Bender, Laurie David and Scott Burns, but it was really Gore who was being recognized for focusing international attention on the issue of global warming and he joined the winners on stage for the acceptance.

"I made this movie for my children," Guggenheim said in his acceptance speech. "We all did. And we did so because we were moved to act by this man... all of us were inspired by his fight for 30 years to tell his truth to all of us."

Al Gore's daughter makes cartoons that are the funniest things on earth. Go, Bender!

Environmental news services online celebrated this news. So did a communist-based news service in China. But when I googled for this story, there were virtually NO media I could link to because this incredible victory and honor for Al Gore was 'disappeared'. I went to the biggest of the big American newspapers, the New York Times which claims to print the news that fits and they saw fit to mention this news in the fifth paragraph of a very thin article that simply listed the Oscar victories. One sentence.

The odious Rich who was a movie critic before being elevated to 'pundit' status said nothing. He has a lot of Al Gore's blood on his dirty hands. Because he criticizes Bush, a lot of people link to him or talk excitedly about him but the Daily Howler keeps close tabs on the endless stream of abuse and lies the mainstream media floods into our political and cultural landscape.

Just for example, here is a Nov. 25, 2002 article by the incomparable Daily Howler:

THAT’S RICH: Normal people have a word for it: Lying. We refer to Frank Rich’s inexcusable column in Saturday’s New York Times. Rich—the self-admiring incompetent who, along with Maureen Dowd, ginned up that fateful Love Story nonsense—doesn’t believe you should vote for Al Gore. But instead of trying to argue his case, he quickly started spinning you blue:

RICH: The [Gores’] books celebrate The Family, the one cause every Democrat feels compelled to embrace after Monicagate. The reviews for the author are thumbs up… Rich—who, incredibly, can’t stop talking about Monica Lewinsky!—implies that Gore is “embracing” the family due to Lewinsky concerns. But of course, the Gores have staged a Nashville “Family Reunion”—a forum on issues facing the family—every year since the early 90s (see below). Like all pundits, Rich knows this fact; he simply doesn’t want you to know it. So he dumps the fact from his piece. Prepare yourself for a dark, mordant chuckle: In this baldly dissembling way, Rich warns you about Al Gore’s character!

I expected the left blogsphere to celebrate wildly when the Academy Awards honored Al Gore. I remember when Farenheit 9/11 was given an award: the TV station run by total right wingers, ABC, had its crew boo very loudly into microphones! None of the mainstream press pointed this out, of course. Instead, they deep-sixed this embarrassment and ditto, the filmmaker himself. Michael Moore is seldom in the news these days. Like Al Gore.

I'm not really blaming the left side of the sphere for dropping the ball, they are trapped in the same matrix they complain about so bitterly. But instead of merely reacting to whatever the right spews forth, we have an obligation to talk about the good news that concerns us and indeed, I, myself, am just as trapped as everyone else in this stupid molasses news cycle.

The main tool I use to avoid this is to read mostly foreign news. It is also an eye-opener because it holds up a dim mirror to ourselves. But the main thing is, the rotting corpse of a demented, corrupt, pill-popping gold digger has been top news for weeks with everyone running every possible fragment of a storyline to milk this rancid cow of a story and at the same time, a man who should have been President of the USA because he won the popular vote, is ignored when, for the very first time, someone of his political stature has won an Oscar!

Well, after throwing every possible bric-brack at Jimmy Carter for telling the harsh truth about Israel is doesn't surprise me to see Al Gore being ignored because he is warning us about our own actions destroying our own planet. What next? Warnings about World War III?

Back to the bad news, everyone!

Culture of Life News Main Page

All Over The Earth, Bloggers Go To Prison

Elaine Meinel Supkis

An Egyptian law student is being sent to prison and torture in our allied country, Egypt, for posting political analysis on the internet. The Iman kidnapped by the CIA demands justice and freedom but will probably go back to prison for daring to talk about his torture in public and Ernest Zundel is sentenced to harsh prison conditions for doubting the Holocaust. This is all ridiculous and evil.

Of course, Condi recently praised the dictator of Egypt.

Egyptian blogger Abdel Kareem Nabil Suleiman has been detained since November [AP]

An Alexandria court has convicted an Egyptian blogger for insulting both Islam and the Egyptian president, sentencing him to four years in jail over his writings on the internet.

During the trial, an Egyptian imam allegedly kidnapped by CIA agents in Italy and taken to Egypt, showed up to speak to the media, breaking his release conditions.

Known as Abu Omar, the former Milan-based imam on Thursday told reporters that he was tortured in an Egyptian prison and that he wants to return to Italy.

He showed the cameras scars he said were from torture in Egyptian jails and said he will resort to the Italian government to help him.

Thanks to the Founding Fathers, we still have freedom of speech here in the USA. But they are trying to eliminate this as much as possible and before the internet, it didn't matter much because anything outsiders wrote would be ignored safely but now we can be read by anyone who wants to click on our URLs. I have readers all over the earth, most of them come via my cartoons which can be googled. Others type in key words and get my site. Of course, the government could do tricks like get search engines to boycott irritating writers like myself but so far, this hasn't happened to me...yet.

As the economic system here deteriorates and as our wars go from bad to worse, I am expecting a crackdown on us internet users who pass on information the government wants ignored.

Of course, much of our media don't mind carrying stories about the Egyptian kid being punished for writing intelligent analysis online. They might even feel sort of sorry for him but since Egypt is part of our empire and we pay the dictator there a ton of money to keep the Palestinians penned into Gaza and starving to death...a recent story claims 50% of the them, mostly children, are starving to death, the media isn't going to hammer Mubarak.

Egypt seethes with hatred for the USA. This young blogger is a liberal and thus, a future important person with whom we should be planning to do business: he wants our sort of political system! For crying out loud. He isn't a radical conservative seeking cutting ties! But he will emerge from his prison hell a radical Muslim. This is absolute. And he might lead a future army against us. We can't tell. Maybe he will simply be murdered in prison, a more likely situation since we rule with an iron fist.

Meanwhile, Germany puts a man in prison for Holocaust denial!

February 5, 2007

My Dear Jeff

Greetings to you from Mannheim Prison...my fifth prison in the last four years. This must be some kind of record for a man not yet convicted of anything. But that, too, will change soon - for we are in the last days of what passes for a 'judicial' proceeding here.

Jeff, NO American could believe - without actually having experienced it - what is going on here. The unfamiliar or the non-initiated could simply not believe that in an otherwise modern nation, proceedings like these could actually take place.

This totally infurates me. We get hosed with holocaust this and holocaust museum that and most of our media is owned by open Zionists and many reporters and commentators and neo cons and so on are Jewish and they have a huge influence on the stream of information in the world and they put this poor man in prison for his itty bitty webpage?

IS THIS DEMOCRACY??? IS GERMANY A NAZI STATE????

It is. The lesson of the Holocaust wasn't 'killing Jews is bad' but 'fascists who destroy our rights are evil.' The blogger left wing never mentions any of this. The Zionist organizations supposedly for free speech and democracy are silent or want this sort of misrule extended to America! My nation!

The rank attacks on Jimmy Carter disgusted me. The abuse of the Palestinian people nauseates me. Turning Germany into a Nazi prison state that puts people in prison for disputes about history is evil.

Turkey won't allow Kurds to dispute history, they are put in prison. Turkey is an ally of the USA. Turkey won't let our Congress talk about the Armenian Holocaust! But then Japan won't let us talk about them raping school girls during WWII, either. And the key to all this is, states are using their power to prevent history from being discussed or acted on. Why the left bloggers can't see the dangers to themselves for ignoring this important news irritates me.

Deliberately ignoring this loss of freedom is dangerous for any blogger or web master put in prison for merely TALKING about history or the news means you or I can be put in prison too! What if I go to Germany again and am arrested like the English historian was arrested in Austria, because I wrote something that angered someone over there? I write all sorts of stuff!

A blogger in Russia is going to prison for making fun of Putin! He is a victim! We are all in this together, left, right and center! No government should imprison ANYONE for discussing current affairs or mocking leaders. This is tyranny of the most evil sort.

And Zundel says it very well indeed:

When I try to explain to them that in America one could write about and discuss virtually any topic without the ever-present threat of being arrested, tried, convicted, fined and even imprisoned for just thinking or writing about things other than the orthodox, generally accepted viewpoints, seems unbelievable to most. They respond as if one is feeding them some kind of American propaganda. Thus, I often feel like a fish out of water.

Our nation was founded by people who ardently believed in freedoms (even as they were slave owners, alas!). Now that we have freed the slaves, we have to keep this freedom. And ignoring people losing their freedom just because we don't agree with them is stupid. We have to stand united! Or we all fall.

We have been steadily losing freedoms thanks to attacks on the left and the right as both sides of the political spectrum find increasing reasons to interfere with the flow of debate and struggle for hearts and minds. People don't fall for Nazi ideology because it is there, they go for it because it appeals to them just like socialist ideology gains ground as people find it sympathetic to their needs!

And debating all this means being allowed to talk openly and honestly. Lies get defeated by honorable debate, not putting people in prison.

Culture of Life News Main Page

Bomb Scare Aimed At Media NOT Reported By Reporters In White House

Elaine Meinel Supkis

I started reading Xinhua news regularily after my daughter was unable to get on the train to come home due to a bomb scare that was TOTALLY blacked out of the American media! I read it in the Chinese news as it was unfolding! Well, another bomb scare and another media black-out.

The entire media witness this event since it happened to THEM!

WASHINGTON, Feb. 2 (Xinhua) -- The White House Conference Center, the temporary press room near the U.S. presidential residence, was evacuated for half an hour Friday in a bomb scare, CNN reported.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto had begun his briefing on 9:30 a.m. when he was interrupted by Deputy Press Secretary Scott Stanzel, who said everyone must leave the building, according to the report.

A nearby car checked by a bomb-sniffing dog had tested positive, Stanzel said.

Later, Secret Service said nothing suspicious was found in the vehicle, which was driven by a government contractor and had been stopped at the entrance to the White House complex.

During the bomb scare, nearby streets were closed, but the presidential residence of White House itself was not evacuated.

I know the press corpse (deliberate misspelling) doesn't care if they are blown to smithereens or run over by a big tractor driven by Bush or whatever but not even mentioning news that happens to them, themselves, well! HAHAHA. Why do we have these guys in the first place? Are they all this brain-dead? Just the mere fact that they were sent scurrying like the little rats they are, into the streets because of fears they were going to be blown up, isn't that in the normal world, news?

It should be, I would suggest. Even if no one gives a damn if any of these toads were blown up, they, themselves, should care. The communist Chinese cared enough to make it a sub-headline story at the top of the list of new stories out of America, the land that is terrified it will be blown up. This dovetails with the 'land of the fearful' that we have become. It is very important to see that our ruler is a terrified rabbit and the military in our police state are in hysteria and we are madly scuttling about, trying to avoid being blown up.

So I am adding story number 4 to the list of people running this story today.

Fox news, of all people, were the only Americans to run this story. And all they did was run the same stupid, terse wire put out, obviously their own reporter couldn't tell the story him or herself because they don't know how to write or report anything. This affllicts the entire press corpse. Did we see pictures of Bush laughing while running these idiots over?

No? HELL, it was a damn photo-ops! There should be tons of footage.

And so it goes. If you want to know what is going on here, read the news put out by people who plan to destroy us. You can bet, they are tracking everything, closely.

Ditto Bin Laden. Only he doesn't run any newspapers. Maybe we should ask him.

Click here to see short Fox news story. I will also note, we can see from the illustration at the top, the Fox news headline was written by someone who decided to minimize it as much as possible since there is no descriptive words like 'BOMB THREAT!' or some such. It is the most ho-hum headline they could devise.

Click here to read the Canadian news story (the Canadians get more news about us than we do, too!).

Culture of Life News Main Page

Bush, Driving Caterpillar, Laughs As He Nearly Runs Over Reporters

Elaine Meinel Supkis

HAHAHA. Bush tried to Rachael Corrie the entire press corpse (they do smell) who were supposed to take pictures of him being a he-man driving a big Caterpillar earthmover. He found this near murder to be really hilarous. I agree in a mordant, Dick Cheney way.

&hearts Bush is a 6 year old brat who should be sent to reform school, of course.

At "The Gaggle," Newsweek reporter Holly Bailey writes that the president clambered into the driver's seat of Caterpillar's giant D10 tractor. "I would suggest moving back...I'm about to crank this sucker up," she reports him saying.

But as White House staff started to move the press corps back, the situation became more chaotic. Bailey writes that "the tractor lurched forward" and White House staff "too were forced to scramble for safety. "Get out of the way!" a news photographer yelled. "I think he might run us over!""

Bush chuckled about the incident, and referenced driving the tractor during his speech, saying "I'm impressed by a culture of excellence and accomplishment that is the spirit of Caterpillar. I also appreciate the chance to drive a D10. If you've never driven a D10 -- (laughter) -- it's a cool experience. (Laughter)," according to the White House website.

We know it is dangerous to hunt with Cheney who has the brains of a Dennis the Menace crossed with Darth Vader having a migrane headache. We know Bush runs over people. He married his wife because she ran over and killed her ex-boyfriend. He tried to run her into walls periodically so this was a marriage made in hell, of course.

He ran over a Bobbie in England, just for example. He thought that was a laugh riot, of course. He almost ran over other diplomats at a world forum, the one he spat food all over everyone at the dinner table after attacking the President of Germany. He probably tried to run over Hu and Wen when they had him in their vicinity. It wouldn't surprize me to learn that Putin has a standing shoot to kill order for his body guards if Bush lurches into his direction.

I use backhoes and other equipment a lot. One doesn't play with them. They can go through buildings. A careful, sober hand has to be on the wheel. One has to be very aware of who is nearby which is why I know the IDF soldier who murdered Rachael did it deliberately, he could see her perfectly well, I could tell from the films.

Bush should be arrested. He is a drunk driver. He is the fool on the hill. He went AWOL, he violates the Constitution of the USA, he illegally invades countries disarmed by the UN, he...arrest him. Put him on trial. Let the whole world do it.

And no, I don't feel sorry for the stupid reporters who were working for him, doing a dumb photo-op. They won't show us the film of this crime, of course. Pfffft.

Culture of Life News Main Page

Evil Editors At WP Pretend There Is No Antiwar Movement

Elaine Meinel Supkis

I am totally fed up with the flood of recent articles all over the mainstream media and some misbegotten but popular blogs, bemoaning the lack of any mass antiwar demonstrations. Not one of them ever dare mention the latest upcoming blow-out demonstration in DC this very next Saturday: January 27th, at the Mall! I'll be there and the WP, NYT and all those weepy bloggers blubbering about the lack of demonstrators better be there or else. Heh. I'll write nasty stuff about them.

&hearts The criminal organ, the Washington Post, a warmongering rag, loves to publish articles bemoaning the lack of antiwar demonstrations.

By John McMillian
Saturday, January 20, 2007; 12:00 AM

Recently I finished teaching a freshman seminar at Harvard called "From Reform to Revolution: Youth Culture in the 1960s." When I built the syllabus, I asked students to ponder a single, overarching question: "How did the youth rebellion of the 1960s happen?" That is, what caused millions of young people to pierce the bland and platitudinous din that characterized the early Cold War years? Why did so many youths -- many of them affluent and college-educated -- suddenly decide that American society needed to be radically overhauled?

Um, it truly pisses me off the fact that this smarmy professor doesn't mention the upcoming January 27th antiwar demonstration in DC. I am going to be there and reporting about how the media will not cover it just like the refused the last times we had identical demonstrations! It is getting absurd, these attacks on those of us who desperately try to do something while the WP refuses to mention an obvious event that is upcoming and very, very important.

Shall we run cars into the lobby of their headquarters and tie up the editors and scream at them? Most of the time when Cindy Sheehan bravely pushes the war protests right in the face of DC, the media sneers at her, ignores her or brutalizes her even more than the cops. Her profound bravery and siingle-minded valor is historic and on the level of Joan d'Arc. But does the WP give her precious editorial space to ask for us to join her on January 27th? No? NO!!!

This crappy paper prefers to hand over the ink to this bubbling bastard. On the brink of WWIII, this is the discourse. It infuriates me. Gah. I will visit them on the 27th. Drag them into the demonstration.

In the sixties, getting together demonstrations was hard work! I did it! I drew leaflets which had to be done on a primitive machine called 'mimeographs' that needed a carbon copy that had to be drawn by hand if I wanted illustrations. I discovered if we didn't illustrate a leaflet, no one would accept them. My first art commissions were doing these leaflets!

Then we had to pass them out and plaster them about town. Lots of work there, hard to find volunteers. We had to train people in crowd control, we had to have medics...I was one for years! Dangerous job, too.

Then we had to have good speakers and banners...I painted hundreds of those! And then we had to actually demonstrate and since people wanted to kill us, this was no small matter: it was very dangerous even in strongholds like Berkeley! They shot guns at us! They killed us! They beat us unmercifully!

The anti-WTO demonstrators were beaten and shot and abused. They don't bother now, it is deadly. This doesn't mean no one cares! Our country is going down the drain because the people struggling to stop the betrayal of Americans failed thanks to the WP and its minions and the ruling elites it serves.

I will definitely let these clowns at the WP know about Saturday's demonstration. I know where they are hiding. They will see me soon! Miz Liberty will shine the light of truth on them no matter how hard they try to lie or cover up reality. I intend to take lots and lots of pictures.

Culture of Life News Main Page

USA Elites Can't Understand Why Islamic People Reject Our Brutal Messages

This nice lady took the trouble to come all the way from Texas to DC in 2003 to try to stop this fatal war. Elaine Meinel Supkis

This is beyond pathetic. The Pentagon and our rulers use every media tool they have to turn public opinion to serve their imperial needs. Thanks to modern technology, masses of people can see the real news in real time! This irritates our rulers no end. They want the media's message totally controlled by themselves.

&hearts Newsweek is a warmongering imperialist rag just like 99% of American media.

A draft report recently produced by the Baghdad embassy's director of strategic communications Ginger Cruz and obtained by NEWSWEEK makes the stakes clear: "Without popular support from US population, there is the risk that troops will be pulled back ... Thus there is a vital need to save popular support via message." Under the heading domestic messages, Cruz goes on to recommend 16 themes to reinforce with the American public, several of which Bush is likely to hit: "vitally important we succeed"; "actively working on new approaches"; "there are no quick or easy answers."

What's even more telling is that the iraqi messages—the very next section—are still "TBD," to be determined. Indeed, the document so much as admits that despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars, the United States has lost the battle for Iraqi public opinion: "Insurgents, sectarian elements, and others are taking control of the message at the public level." Videos of U.S. soldiers being shot and blown up, and of the bloody work of sectarian death squads, are now pervasive. The images inspire new recruits and intimidate those who might stand against them. "Inadequate message control in Iraq," the draft warns, "is feeding the escalating cycle of violence." (A U.S. Embassy spokesperson claims the document reflects Cruz's personal views, not official policy.)

Sunni insurgents in particular have become expert at using technology to underscore—some would say exaggerate—their effectiveness. "The sophistication of the way the enemy is using the news media is huge," Lt. Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the former commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, told NEWSWEEK just before he returned to the United States. Most large-scale attacks on U.S. forces are now filmed, often from multiple camera angles, and with high-resolution cameras. The footage is slickly edited into dramatic narratives: quick-cut images of Humvees exploding or U.S. soldiers being felled by snipers are set to inspiring religious soundtracks or chanting, which lends them a triumphal feel. In some cases, U.S. officials believe, insurgents attack American forces primarily to generate fresh footage.

Guerrillas have always sought alternative technologies to undermine their better-equipped enemies. What's different now is the power and accessibility of such tools. Production work that once required a studio can now be done on a laptop.

Oh my god. The citizens of Iraq get information despite all the overt messages from the imperials? Hahaha. What can one say about this except, tough beanies.

All my life, I have fought the media. When CNN was launched, it gave the news in raw form with virtually no comment. I loved CNN and appeared there, happily. Alarmed by the fact that CNN was rapidly becoming more popular than the BBC even, a bunch of ruling elite men put together a big pot of money and lured the founder of CNN, Ted Turner, into becoming a 'partner.' I ground my teeth in rage. 'Don't do it! They will destroy you!' I told him.

Well, they waited less than a year and threw him out in a sort of coup. He had no power now, none. He said, he didn't care, there was no more danger of WWIII! Well, here we are, on the verge of WWIII thanks to the death of CNN which is now utterly useless for knowledge, it can only be mined for information showing the utter disconnect from reality that characterizes our empire these days.

And so it goes: the rulers think there is some sort of trick they can pull to pull the wool over the world's eyes. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, ain't gonna happen. Or something.

The Bush regime has tried every trick they could to fool Iraqis. These attempts were doomed from the start because the rulers needed jobs for their coddled, cowardly, corrupt little tykes like Cheney's children, and these useless idiots proliferated within the propaganda wing of the White House and they 'messaged' the world until blue in the face, not the veins (being all upstarts and not royalty).

Nothing is working. DUH. I go to many Muslim websites to see the carnage. It is disgusting and yet amusing in a horrible way. The Newsweek article complains about all the blood and gore. They say, we don't see it here!

Well, DUH!!! Of course not! Even the caskets of the dead 'heroes' are hauled home and hidden from view. See any news stories detailing the brain-damaged soldiers? Are they headlines on a daily basis? No? How about the scenes of carnage in Iraq? No?

Indeed. Our lovely media hard at work, hiding reality.

&hearts Bush is throwing aside seasoned generals and using young hot-tempered hot-shots.

Lt. Gen. David H. Petraeus, who is President Bush's choice to become the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, posed a riddle during the initial march to Baghdad four years ago that now becomes his own conundrum to solve: "Tell me how this ends."

That query, uttered repeatedly to a reporter then embedded in Petraeus's 101st Airborne Division, revealed a flinty skepticism about prospects in Iraq -- and the man now asked to forestall a military debacle.

*snip*

Petraeus, if controversial among some peers who deem him arrogant or excessively ambitious, is seen by many others as perhaps the last, best hope for success in Iraq. "If anyone can pick up the baton and run with it, it is David Petraeus," said retired Gen. Gordon R. Sullivan, a former Army chief of staff.

After spending 2 1/2 of the past four years in Iraq, as a division commander and then as the officer overseeing the initial reconstruction of Iraqi security forces, Petraeus is known to believe that a stable, pacified Iraq is still possible -- if not probable -- but not without dramatically improved security. Having also served in Bosnia after the catastrophic civil war there, he has told friends that he sees troubling parallels between that country and Iraq. Two months ago, he said, "I actually stay awake occasionally at night trying to figure out the path ahead."

I'll spare poor Petraeus another sleepless night: this war is going to end exactly like our stupid imperial war in Vietnam. Since he sat out that war and spent it going to school instead of being a hero and volunteering to fight at age 18, like all the chickenhawks running America today, he doesn't know what war really is. He chose to read books instead of learning the hard way, actually fighting.

So he prissily goes about, chest out, yapping when he can't fight his way out of a paper bag without cheating by using depleted uranium proto-nuclear warheads to fight people who have virtually no weapons.

Well, smartypants, guess what? IEDs work just fine if the entire population wants to see you and your ilk dead.

The horror and stupidity of this particular imperial tool is how he explains how attempts at puzzling out the riddle of this war SOMETIMES keeps him up at night! Poor baby.

I have gone into my computer room at very strange hours, roused from my slumbers by my own helpers who tell me what is going on and I spent considerable time figuring out what is going on and it is pretty easy, actually.

The Christian/Jewish crusade to conquer and colonize and loot Muslims is failing because it is a religious war. And all Muslims are increasingly aware that there is no end to this but one: to fight the USA until the world's biggest empire with military bases in 137 countries goes bankrupt and dies! And bin Laden has patiently explained how this works and the Chinese are deep into implementing this program. And since the Chinese, the Russians and all Muslim people as well as more than quite a few South Americans are hoping our empire collapses after going bankrupt, this means much of the world wants us bankrupt.

And we are accommodating them nicely. This dumb Lt. General isn't staying up at night, worrying about the gigantic budget deficit this war and the Pentagon is creating. He doesn't give a fig. He wants more money, more soldiers, more wars. He is filled with blood lust, a man who hasn't nicked his pinkie finger, fighting, wants more soldiers to be blown away!

He doesn't care. None of these guys detroying America lose much sleep. They are cuddled in bed at night, dreaming of the sugar plum fairy and the ginerbread house they plan to eat. And this is why all the propaganda in the universe won't change a thing for us: we are doomed.

Culture of Life News Main Page

David Duke Attacked By AIPAC Tool, Blitzer, Is News

Elaine Meinel Supkis

CNN, once a decent news organization, has greatly deteriorated from the days when I used to appear on CNN back in the late 1980's. Yesterday, much of the web was abuzz over the farcial, unprofessional 'interview' conducted by Wolf Blitzer, a man who hidesl his Zionist activist background, with a neo-Nazi, David Duke. A lot of bloggers join commentators in the Jewish-owned media to wonder why anyone should give anti-Zionistic racists a hearing. Now, back to savaging Jimmy Carter and those pesky professors with the AIPAC study...

&hearts The very same week the media, owned and run by many Jews who are a much greater proportion there than in any other industry, is savaging Carter, they decide to make an example of David Duke.

In a heated interview broadcast on Wednesday, former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke accused CNN's Wolf Blitzer of being an Israeli agent, due to his former work as a lobbyist for a prominent pro-Israel special interest group.

This morning, many bloggers slammed the cable news work for giving the Holocaust denier any airtime at all.

I went all over the web yesterday seeking information on what ethnic/religious background the owners, reporters and other media personalities, etc, were. As I expected, this information barely exists. Indeed, it is more occulted than information about the secret societies that our ruling elites use. One site did have this information: David Duke's pages!

So you could have knocked me over with a feather when he was put on CNN and instead of sputtering and being embarrassed by the hostile 'questions' ('Do you hate Jews?' being the most childish and unprofessional), he instead tried to talk about Wolf Blitzer's past as an AIPAC agent. I didn't know this information because it is deep-sixed by Wolf and his fellow ethnic Zionists.

Nazis have an evil ideology that is a total match to Zionism's ideology: ethnic groups have the right to eliminate, discriminate and manipulate all other ethnic groups, ethnic cleansing is not only OK but is ordered by God himself and might makes right. So pointing this out is good---only this is never pointed out. When Jimmy Carter dared to correctly compare Israel's ghettoization of the Palestinian people, he instantly became the focus of a concerted, vicious and unrelenting series of attacks by Zionists infesting our media. Not one of them introduced themselves by saying, 'I am a Zionist who wants ethnic cleansing.' Nor do they allow anyone to ask them about their own agenda.

I looked a the NYT yesterday, it had an article written by a secret Zionist and the only people he interviewed, aside from Jimmy Carter himself, were all Zionists who attacked him. And none of these were called 'Zionists'. Foxman, of the super-Zionist, misnamed 'Antidefamation League' defamed Jimmy Carter with all his fury. Noam Chomsky, a non-Zionist Jewish professor with a long, destinguished record, was not interviewed by the NYT Zionist reporter.

There is actually a long list of non-Zionist or even anti-Zionist Jewish writers, professors and public people who are not permitted to appear on any mainstream media format, ever. On the rare occasions they do appear, it is done with tremendous hostility from the same media. One method is to have three pro-Zionists debating one non-Zionist.

The other tactic, one that I completely despise, is for the 'interveiwer' to pepper the victim with rapid questions and not give even a split second for them to answer any of the 'questions'. This was done to David Duke. Blinking furiously after his cover was blown when Duke pointed out Blitzer's AIPAC past, Blitzer dropped the mask of professionalism and began to openly attack his guest.

Here is the actual interveiw showing the typical methodology of all Zionist media manipulators at work:

At one point, just like all the media rightwing neo-Nazis, Blitzer acted like a little boy, saying, 'This is my show, you answer my questions.' The control of the mike is most important. 'Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!' is a classic method of silencing critics of the neocon agenda such as wars in the Middle East, Palestinian right of return, people demanding a real investigation of 9/11 and Mossad's role in that event. Usually, people talking about the things the Zionists don't want mentioned, never appear in public at all. This is one reason why virtually no 'liberal' bloggers talk to or with me. They know I will talk about all this and it is a very forbidden topic.

In a press release, the Anti-Defamation League stated that "the participation of racists such as David Duke, former Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan and other notorious Western anti-Semites shows that Iran is intent both on embracing the hateful ideology of Holocaust denial, and giving credibility to the deniers themselves."

This is so cute. It isn't these 'Nazis' and 'Holocaust deniers' who are the problem: they always get in the news, the media owners and staff do this whenever they want to yank chains. And lately, since the Jewish people have launched a very crude, Nazi starvation/economic stranglulation of the Palestinian people, killing women and children at an increasingly rapid rate (deaths due to lack of basic healthcare and sanitation are not listed as 'violent'), it is time for the Zionists to put real Nazis on TV.

David Duke was put on display so the Zionists could use him as a club against anyone rash enough to dare talk about the mistreatment of 'Holocaust deniers.' For years, the Zionist media went after former concentration camp underlings ( but NEVER against Gestapo agents working for the CIA!) in order to flex their powers, mete out punishments and in general, keep the story of the Holocaust in the news without ever discussing the other victims like Gypsies.

Will Bunch, senior writer for the Philadelphia Daily News who blogs at Attytood, understood the "news value" in reporting on Duke, but still called the CNN interview a "bad idea" to begin with.

"We suppose it's newsworthy -- in a sad and incredibly pathetic way -- that a man who was almost elected governor of Louisiana, KKK-turned-GOP lowlife David Duke, would go to Iran to take part in President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's despicable Holocaust-denial fest," Bunch writes. "We also believe -- although we're sympathetic to those who disagree -- that the right of free speech even extends to those with such loathesome and factually incorrect views as those held by David Duke, who claims that Nazi gas chambers didn't exist."

However, Bunch questions the network for feeling the need to devote so much coverage that it amounts to giving an "extremist nut job" a megaphone, by airing an interview with him an hour before prime time.

Typical of many 'liberals' is this idea that certain people should never appear in the news. This really sticks in my own craw because the far left is NEVER in the news except if they are insane or inept. The 'Yuppies', started as a media joke by some Jewish guys, got loving, frequent and mocking attention from the media throughout their career. I knew them. Personally.

I argued with them about enconomics and the politics of national liberation until they began to talk like me. Then the media got really nasty. Cut them off. They got in all sorts of troubles after that. So long as the played their assigned roles as 'clowns' of the left, they were everywhere. Talk about reality and bye-bye baby.

I used to appear on European TV even when in America but never, never on American TV except the time I made a speech and showed my breasts saying, 'THIS will make the news!' And of course, it did. Heh. Today, not even that would work (getting too old).

David Duke tried to talk about the terrible laws in Europe that throttle any discussion of Naziism and the Holocaust. Zionists egged Europeans feeling guilty about Naziism into passing laws muzzling free speech. Our Founding Fathers felt so strongly about this, they enshrined it in the Bill of Rights as the first Amendment! It has been abridged many a time especially during wars, but it still stands guard. Putting 'Holocaust deniers' in prison is pure evil. Indeed, it is NAZI.

I am agast at how so many supporters of Zionism ape Nazi mentality and laws. Each year, Israel's Jews pass increasingly vile Nazi-ish laws. Recently, a law was passed that if a man or woman from 'Israel' marries someone from the occupied territories, the Israeli loses citizenship and their children will be DEPORTED by age 12????? HUH? If this isn't Naziism, I'm a duck.

Today, the Israeli High Court OKed assassinations! They said, if it increases security (for Jews) then it is legal! They also said, the military should be careful and avoid killing too many innocent people while assassinating the leaders and organizers in Palestine. But if bombs dropped on houses do kill, so what?

This news won't appear in America any more than the uproar about Israel having nukes isn't even given a mouse's squeak here. The Israeli Airforce's straffing of the German ships and harrassing NATO peacekeepers didn't make the news here in America AT ALL. Nor does any of the terrible things going on in Palestine like the Israeli/American interdiction of all medical blood supply equipment which has now made the situtation critical there! Not a peep.

This is malicious and deliberate and is part of the Zionist conspiracy to kill off the Palestinians or at least drive them all out and drive them to despair. The need to make all things occult drives the push for anti-free speech laws and regulations. The right wingers in prison in Europe are martyrs and heroes to the far right which is growing ever stronger there. The dangers they represent are very real and the means to control them are failing because the star in the right wing heavens is Israel itself.

Day and night, the Zionists work hard to justify, quantify and strengthen, ethnic/religious bigotry. They are the ones making fascism stronger. They are the ones feeding this monster.

I said years ago, if the left doesn't turn on the Zionists and begin to fight them, ideologically, we lose. We can't pretend to be liberal if we are fascist towards Muslims. The peace movement has been utterly defanged by all this: since organizers of previous demonstrations included speakers talking about Palestine, support for, coverage of and organizing of such demonstrations has vanished.

The media refused to cover the speakers at all the demonstrations in 2002 and 2003. The organizers of these demonstrations never appear in the news anymore, not even to be mocked by Zionist reporters. They are occulted and will remain so. And our Constitution continues to die.

When David Duke tried to talk about all this, Blitzer began nonstop talking, himself. This is a right wing tactic. Always, when an interview veers into verboten territory, the agents begin to talk nonstop. This is why all debates about Israel have to be moderated by real moderators. Otherwise, one hears absolutely nothing except mindless babbling.

I feel sorry for Jimmy Carter. He will soon be occulted. He is too kindly, too sensible. Too sane. We will never hear from him again except via the web. And David Duke?

Many, many Americans are in agreement with him. Antisemitism will now be boosted not because he talked about it but because of the blatant, unfair Jewish attempts at silencing or mocking him. The Zionists are creating their own nightmare world. One that is filled with angry ethnic cleansers seeking to rid themselves of Jewish influences.

Sigh. This is what I want to stop. This is why I want Palestine to be a viable state. It will save the Jewish people from this future hell.

Culture of Life News Main Page

Jewish Media Owners and Reporters Attack Carter Nonstop

Elaine Meinel Supkis

The virulent attacks on Jimmy Carter are ongoing and increasing in volume as an army of well-connected Jews in the media conspire together to destroy anyone challenging their total dominance in the debate over Palestinian rights. I googled many combinations of words that expressed the idea of 'how many Jewish owners of media' and got only Nazi sites or useless sites. No studies, no mainstream media stories, nothing! Talk about pulling the wool over everyone's eyes!

&hearts Here is the usual crew of Jewish writers hired by Jewish media owners raging at former President Carter:

By JULIE BOSMAN
Published: December 14, 2006

On Tuesday night in Phoenix, after signings and interviews to promote his new book, “Palestine Peace Not Apartheid,” President Jimmy Carter made a hastily arranged visit: an hourlong gathering with a group of rabbis.

“We ended up holding hands and circled in prayer,” Mr. Carter said in a telephone interview from Phoenix, adding that the rabbis requested the meeting to discuss his book.

Note how there isn't a bunch of Palestinian Christians or Muslims besieging Carter! The rabbis wanted to pressure him and he graciously consented to pray with them but this doesn't stop the hurricane of fury being directed at him. This is greater than the fury directed at the two professors who dared to study the impact of AIPAC.

One thing that sends a shiver of fear down all the spines of the Jewish media moguls is the possibility someone will study THEM. Namely, the tremendous number of Jewish reporters, writers, critics, pundits, analysts, etc. This is totally forbidden. I decided to Google a couple dozen combinations of words designed to artfully bring up articles on this topic: how many Jewish people work/own/run the media? It didn't matter. No matter how I phrased it, the only sites that came up were on the left, Counterpunch, for example, Noam Chompsky and neo-nazi sites. Otherwise, it was totally invisible!

Mr. Carter wrote in an essay in The Los Angeles Times on Friday that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s lobbying efforts have produced a reluctance to criticize the politics of the Israeli government. The editorial boards of major American newspapers and magazines, he continued, have exercised self-restraint on the subject of Israel and the Palestinians.

A vocal pro-Palestinian viewpoint, he said, is “nonexistent in this country to any detectable degree.”

Which is the claim that Mr. Foxman said he found most offensive. “The reason he gives for why he wrote this book is this shameless, shameful canard that the Jews control the debate in this country, especially when it comes to the media,” he said. “What makes this serious is that he’s not just another pundit, and he’s not just another analyst. He is a former president of the United States.”

I used to be Mrs. Levy. My very Jewish father-in-law was a publisher in New York City. I know that community very well from the inside. I was an outsider, being a shiska and all that. It was something I was reminded of pretty frequently.

If one wants to join in the pro-Israel bias community, one is accepted. But if one utters the fatal words, 'Maybe the Palestinians have a right to fight the Jewish colonialists', bang! Out the door. One is never allowed inside again.

&hearts Here is the ONLY site I found that lists who is Jewish and what media they own or control and of course, it is a right-wing Nazi-type site.

&hearts Here is an old story about Friedman showing how he was corrupted by pay raises:

As editor, Rosenthal on occasion did not conceal his personal bias for Israel. Correspondent Thomas L. Friedman, in an August 1982 dispatch, reported "indiscriminate" Israeli bombing of Beirut. The telex machine in his office soon brought a message from New York. The word "indiscriminate" was editorializing, and editors had deleted it, although praising Friedman for "good work under dangerous conditions."

Friedman replied that he had purposely used the word after traveling around Beirut and concluding that the bombing that day was fundamentally different from what had happened on the previous 63 days. "What can I say?" Friedman telexed. "I am filled with profound sadness by what I have learned in the past afternoon about my newspaper."

In a rage, Rosenthal ordered him to return to New York immediately. Friedman expected he would be fired. By the time Friedman arrived in New York for a lunch appointment, however, Rosenthal came in "looking unhappy, glowered at Friedman and then said: 'You are receiving a $5,000 raise.'" After Friedman described what had actually been taking place in Beirut, Rosenthal seemed relaxed and friendly. However, he warned: "If you ever pull a stunt like that again, you are fired!"

The carpet of gold versus the carpet of bombs. If Friedman insisted on covering the crimes of the Israelis, he would have been marginalized and driven out of the business. Instead, he became a devoted 'Mini-me' Zionist and now misdirects and misinforms readers with happy abandon. One searches in vain for pro-Hamas writers in any American media. It just does not exist! This total wipe-out of a vital, important political voice in the Middle East is echoed by near zero coverage of anything about Iran or Syria that is pro- either country.

Indeed, Venezuela is treated the same way!

&hearts Counterpunch is one of the few sites on the left that have taken this matter by the horns more than once.

In an analysis of the nationalistic reaction to the intifada throughout the Arab world written two weeks into the intifada, Judith Miller wrote that the "rift between Israeli Jews and the Arab citizens of Israel" was another "profound emotional scar" left by the violence. Her evidence of the "emotional scar" was that Israeli Jews "were horrified by the ferocity of this uprising, which closed off large sections of their country, and by the 'Death to the Jews' slogans chanted by the Arab protesters." She made no mention of an emotional scar for Israeli Palestinians, no mention at all of the fact that 13 unarmed Israeli--Palestinian demonstrators had recently been shot to death, no mention that Israeli police had never in Israel's history opened fire on demonstrators when they were Israeli Jews, and no mention of the fact that Israeli Jewish demonstrators had chanted "Death to Arabs" during demonstrations at the same time.

The BBC used to cover news in Palestine and then they stopped after the massacre in Jenin. I saw the last true BBC news stories there when a fine reporter, a woman, refused to let the IDF shoot an old lady who was in the middle of the street, crying, because they shot her disabled husband in a wheelchair dead. The IDF threatened to shoot the reporter!

This went around the world via the internet and Jewish moneymoguls descended upon England, demanding the BBC be 'fair' and the people reporting from Israel were pulled and the curtain fell and since then, the news from there is fully censored and the Jewish overlords watch the BBC like hawks. I no longer go there seeking news from the Middle East. I get better news from China, of all places.

Anyone observing all this can see, Jimmy Carter is the victim of a Jewish conspiracy to silence him and to keep the veil of darkness over the Jewish crimes in the Middle East and this is so they can manipulate Americans into supporting crimes against humanity. This destruction of the Jewish ideals of liberty, equality and peace is going to hammer the Jewish people when more than one nation turns on them, they are extremely unpopular in much of the world right now and it isn't getting better at all.

It gets worse by the hour. Putting people in prison for 'antisemitism' in Europe isn't stopping Neo-naziism, it is strengthening it tremendously. Preventing Americans from discussing the Middle East and how to help the Palestinian people isn't going to make Jewish people safer, it it fueling anti-semitism!

All the Jewish people running things here have to say is, 'Yes, we dominate the media. Yes, the Palestinian people have a right for sovereignty. And yes, the Constitution is a great thing and separation of Church and State is a noble ideal which we should take to the Middle East!' See? Easy.

Ethnic cleansing=evil. Civil rights for everyone and a fair media that isn't dominated by any one interest group=good. The Muslim demands cartoonists not mock Mohammed got a lot of laughs, cynicism and joking about how touchy they were here in the West. But anyone bringing up any topic that makes fun of Jews gets utterly destroyed. Imagine cartoons making fun of Jewish media owners! Impossible. Will never ever see the light of day as Iran's President likes to point out.

Culture of Life News Main Page