CNN Begins Relentless Attacks On Ron Paul Of Texas

Elaine Meinel Supkis

The media, very heavily influenced by people seeking greater powers for colonizing Palestine, has gone nuts trying to figure out how to strangle Ron Paul, one of the few sort of sane, really a real conservative Republicans in DC. Because Ron told the truth about why we are fighting more and more Muslims, the media and the real rulers are trying to prevent Ron Paul from participating in any more debates. Isn't it fun, living in the Soviet Union?

From Antiwar.com:

Hearing Rep. Ron Paul recite the reasons for Arab and Islamic resentment of the United States, including 10 years of bombing and sanctions that brought death to thousands of Iraqis after the Gulf War, Rudy Giuliani broke format and exploded:

"That's really an extraordinary statement, as someone who lived through the attack of 9/11, that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq. I don't think I have ever heard that before, and I have heard some pretty absurd explanations for Sept. 11.

After the debate, on Fox News' "Hannity and Colmes," came one of those delicious moments on live television. As Michael Steele, GOP spokesman, was saying that Paul should probably be cut out of future debates, the running tally of votes by Fox News viewers was showing Ron Paul, with 30 percent, the winner of the debate.

Brother Hannity seemed startled and perplexed by the votes being text-messaged in the thousands to Fox News saying Paul won, Romney was second, Rudy third and McCain far down the track at 4 percent.

That debate seemed more like an audition for a replacement for Hitler after his suicide. Except for Ron Paul, most of the Republicans wanted to show how each was more a warmonger and human rights criminal than the other. Except for McCain who flew a plane and didn't fight on the ground, all the other candidates espousing torture and war were cowards.

After Ron Paul 'unexpectedly' won the debates, hands down, by far, the media went into high gear on a typical smear campaign. CNN pulled out Wolf Blitzer, a member of that treasonous organization that spies on our military and bribes our politicians, AIPAC, to 'take down Ron Paul.' A previous 'interview' which was mostly this AIPAC traitor raging against former Nazi, David Duke, blew up in Wolf's face when David mostly talked about Wolf's involvement with AIPAC.

This time around, Wolf decided they would not talk about his own treasonous connections and instead, he hammered on Ron Paul, insinuating that anyone who dares to talk about why we are at war with Muslims is unamerican. This Zionist propaganda point is nearly universal in our media. Anyone who connects the dots from the invasion and dispossession of the Palestinians to the ongoing need to control the oil of the Muslim people, is attacked. No one is allowed to see the obvious. But alas for CNN and other Zionist media outlets, we have the internet now and people who were censored or silenced are now able to talk to each other and no longer feeling isolated or alone, are now shoving back.

Here is a video of this interesting interview wherein Wolf used some pretty crude Nazi-style Soviet questioning and CNN used pathetic visual images of terrorists as a psycho-prop tool to associate Rep. Paul with 'the evil doers.'

The childish propaganda tools used by CNN were astonishing. They carefully framed the American Representative with all sorts of scary things which interfered with listening to him try to answer the badgering and frankly fascist questioning by the AIPAC tool, Blitzer. Early Nazi propaganda worked this way. For example, if someone was talking on film and the Nazis wanted watchers to be nauseated by the person being viewed, they would interpose shots of insects and rats every few moments. I don't watch any TV anymore, not since our rulers openly destroyed our ability to have real elections. But looking at how obvious they are when viewing these Youtube segments is most interesting and sickening.

CNN, being a fascist organization set up to feed propaganda, has lost all ability to show respect and courtesy. Not only do their interviewers, some of whom are agents of foreign powers, badger anyone they oppose, they use these cheap tricks to negate any messages the victims they are interviewing are trying to get across.

Imagine if Martin Luther King appeared on CNN in say, 1963. While he talks about Civil Rights and how his organization is trying to peacefully gain this important goal, CNN would probably show pictures of blacks rioting or committing crimes. Luckily for us, back then, this didn't happen. Today, news that doesn't fit the propaganda points of the media are ignored or belittled. When Blitzer DEMANDED that Ron Paul support Guilliani, 'because he is the front runner,' Paul playfully suggested Blitzer was wrong, it was the reverse. For he has won every single debate so far, hands down. Instead of answering him, Blitzer plowed on to yet another attack which Ron Paul swatted down, easily.

But how DARE Blitzer, a man working for an alien country, throw accusations of 'Unamerican' at our citizens? How DARE he? I would dearly love to deport his ass back to Israel. And this goes for anyone who places any country before this one. If they want to be traitors, they cannot call us traitors for supporting protecting OUR OWN nation. Period. And understanding the roots of 9/11 and all the other battles that are raging today and bankrupting America is life and death for our entire nation. The longer we walk this bloody path, the more likely we will end up poor and helpless.

From Alertnet:

The U.S. military needs more time in Iraq than the American public is willing to invest and that difference is "troubling," the top U.S. Marine Corps official said on Thursday.
*snip*
"I think there is less of an appetite in our country than we, the military, might think we need to sustain that kind of effort over that period of time," he said.

Conway would not comment on how long U.S. troops might stay in Iraq, or how long he thinks they should stay to secure the country and help Iraq build its military.

Our military is one happy pig in the poke, well, not the poor soldiers dying in the desert but the piggies oinking it up here at home. The Pentagon should be rebuilt to look like a pig sty. Sooooweeiii, pig-pig-pig! By the way, pigs love to hear that sound for some reason. Even strange pigs will run to me if I call them this way.

Back to the Pentagon piggies: if there is peace, their budget drops. In 1999, it was a measly $250 billion a year. But since we have declared war on a billion people, it has soared to the heavens and is over $500 billion a year if you include all the special spending bills that inevitably are called for since no one wastes money better than the military!

Even as the National Guard no longer can bring in trucks to evacuate American citizens when disasters like floods, hurricanes, earthquakes and tornadoes hit, the military has tons of money for war machines to use against Muslims who want us out of their homelands. Click here to see who voted for expanding the miltiary budget by yet another 10%! And here is the list of the very few who voted against this reckless, imperialist, ANTI-AMERICAN bill:

Conyers and Kucinich were two top Democrats who voted for America. Kucinich, like Ron Paul who also voted against this ghastly imperial budget, is also running for President. And like Ron Paul, the Zionists or Imperialists running our media circus hates him and smears him at every turn. Bot Ron Paul and Kucinich are victims of gross propaganda ploys. If the media hated and attacked Al Gore for the same reasons, they will pull out all stops to stop these two patriots.

Emboldened by the tsunami of attacks directed at the patriotic Texan, the GOP is now angling to cut Ron Paul out of all future debates. But the poor souls who dream of right wing power are not happy with the present system and are even more likely to bolt the Republican party if they assault the front runner, Ron Paul. Already, the GOP is losing ground with the moralists who now realize they have been had.

Not that the Democratic Party is any better. The guy who controls the joint money accounts for candidates is as nasty a Zionist/dual citizen as Wolf Blitzer. Steny Hoyer is the Majority Leader and he is just as set on colonizing and dominating everyone in the 'Holy Land' as Wolf Blitzer. If he appears on Wolf's show, he won't be surrounded by pictures of cockroaches or rats. Instead, they will have an agreeable conversation. And of course, both will talk about the need for American tax payers to go to China for loans to pay for our endless wars of domination in the Middle East.

From Raw Story:

A bipartisan group of senators is pushing legislation that would force the CIA to release an inspector general's report on the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The CIA has spent more than 20 months weighing requests under the Freedom of Information Act for its internal investigation of the attacks but has yet to release any portion of it.

The agency is the only federal office involved in counterterrorism operations that has not made at least a version of its internal 9/11 investigation public.

And once again, the whole business of 9/11 comes crawling out of the rubble of our empire. Online, there is a very large and loud community that wants to talk about 9/11 and they have already decided the authors of that attack live in the White House. So much tremendous disbelief and anger now surrounds this event that a recent jury for a 'terrorism' trial was nearly impossible to assemble because so many potential jurors believed 9/11 was a government inside job! Indeed, there are so many bloody fingerprints all over 9/11 that determining exactly what degree of treason applies is difficult which is why I like to say, arrest them all!

The CIA does many things along with the Mossad and we would dearly love to see exactly how deep and how dirty this association is. Which is why none of this will see the light of day just like the 9/11 Commission didn't put Bush, Cheney and Condi under oath or force Bush and Cheney to talk in public. The secrets surrounding our Israel colonization efforts is exactly linked to bin Laden's war against us and is the dark thing that is fueling our incessant, expensive wars with a billion Muslims.

Today, Israel is bombing Gaza yet again. They attack this ghetto as if it were Warsaw, 1944. Every day this goes on, our prospects in the Middle East worsen. Today, the freedom fighters in Iraq blew up some more of our helicopters. As well as killing more of our soldiers. The military/industrial money mongers in DC celebrate every time equipment is destroyed. Banzai! They get richer and richer, the more stuff is blown up.

An endless, very expensive war translates into mansions, fancy cars, expensive wine and women and lots of fun. So what, if this bankrupts the empire!

Culture of Life News Main Page

Comments

[D. F. Facti]

Wow.

That video was amazing. Total, 100% propaganda.

"Blames US for 9/11"

Fortunately, lots more people get it than Wolfie would like. Bad news is, any candidate - like debate winner Paul - on goddamned FOX, no less - who tells the truth so that it resonates with people - would be assassinated - just as they are assassinating Paul now.

[JSmith]

An odd article for you to write, as you noted in the "West attacks China" thread that

"Ron Paul is not liberal at all. He is a classic conservative and would have happily kept Jim Crow going and no civil rights for women, etc. Don't be fooled by his opposition to imperialism which is, by the way, admirable. And very old-fashioned. At least he votes against funding these wars.

Posted by: Elaine Meinel Supkis | May 18, 2007 at 08:30 AM "

OK... so he opposes imperialism. That's just grand. But he still has a Kucinich's chance of attaining the Presidency.

[Elaine Meinel Supkis]

His conservativism is very brutal. If you are sick or weak, you basically die. If you need money for better healthcare or schools, forget about it. And he is a racist.

[blues]

No, Paul is not a liberal. But there is no such thing as a "conservative" anymore. We have paleo-conservatives and we have neocons . Here is just what I said at a name-brand liberal blog on May 18:

««Ron Paul is no libertarian, really. He is a paleo-conservative. This group is quite large. I visit a lot of paleo sites. They come from backgrounds that tend to give them a slight connection to racism, but they are generally not like that. The former weapons inspector, Scott Ritter is one of them. He still gets along with liberals, and so on. Paul is about 95% in touch with what the most liberal people want. And remember I am a Kucinich supporter.

««These paleos are quite numerous, and they tend to be decent and respectable. Here is a paleo site that I visit frequently for economic information:»»

http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/

[blues]

They make brutal and frightening noises, and may have vague connections to racists, but their bite is often much less than their bark. I think it's largely do the the nature of the vocabulary of their special language. Which is exactly why the neocons succeeded in fooling so many, pretending to be paleo-conservatives, and their bite being far worse than their goofy bark.

[blues]

Of course, you never know how one of these fish are going to flop until they get in and make their moves. I would rather have, say, Kucinich.

[D. F. Facti]

God, yes, to Kucinich.

He pissed off the Cleveland establishment when he was just a pup - someone who understands that serving the public interest does not entail handing over the keys to the vault to the thugs in Brooks Brothers attire.

In a way it's amazing that someone like Kucinich can have a career in politics - or ANYTHING - considering how rightwing the media establishment is - and how much power the corporatocracy wields. He's like a Gene McCarthy lost in 2007 - except they keep sending him back to Congress.

Ron Paul is from Texas, which is, after all, a different country. And Elaine is probably right about his being s social Darwinist. I can only get so far with the Libertarian viewpoint. I like their fiscal restraint and fear of Big Brother, be he a leftist or his current incarnation. But no man is an island - and they generally don't get that.

[DeVaul]

Yeah, Elaine is right. There has to be some kind of really nasty side to Ron Paul for him to be re-elected year after year from a district in TEXAS. Remember: Texas brought is the Bush clan and all kinds of other vile men.

I do not envision a district in Texas, isolated from every other one around it, where the citizens read the Constitution everyday and understand what a Republic is. There has to be some other kind of appeal that Ron Paul uses to fight off the imperialists who would dearly love to take his job, and I am betting it is not a very pretty picture.

I looked up his voting record and noticed he spends a lot of time voting on anti-abortion bills and legislation. That is not really encouraging. That is an invasion of privacy, although I am sure he does not think so.

Still, he does at least understand the basics of our Constitution and what the intent of the Founding Fathers was regarding foreign policy and separation of powers, and that is quantum leap from the gang of criminals who currently infest our capital.

[Elaine Meinel Supkis]

An honest debate with an honest conservative: it is refreshing in the extreme!

Now, try debating the issue of Israel's fascist religious dictatorship with Hillary Zionist Clinton.

This is the problem: even when Ron talked without mentioning Palestine, how our actions in the Middle East might cause wars to come here, he didn't have the guts to talk about our insane support of the Jewish fascist state that is ethnically cleansing Muslims AND Christian natives out of the Holy Land which is holy to THREE religions, not one.

Gads. Why can't any American politician talk about this? Heh. The media has destroyed Jimmy Carter over this.

[DeVaul]

This is from Yahoo News:

"PHOENIX - A military contractor is recruiting current and former agents with the U.S. Border Patrol to teach Iraqis how to secure their national borders."

Can you believe this? Will our Coast Guard be transferred to Iraq also to teach them how to protect their shores?

I'm beginning to think that the fortress we are building in Baghdad will become our new capitol. That would at least place it at the center of our foreign and domestic affairs.

[Elaine Meinel Supkis]

I wish we could ship all our politicians to Iraq.